Intersubjectivity and language in the clinical encounter

Towards a theory of communication in health

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/2i.6450

Keywords:

Language, Medicine, Health Communication, Wilhelm von Humboldt

Abstract

Medicine is theoretically grounded in the construction of an eminently rationalist and mechanistic discourse, detached from the subjective historicity inherent in humanistic approaches that emphasize the way of life or the quality of existence. This disconnect has, since the mid-20th century, given rise to a countercurrent advocating for the “re-humanization” of medicine, primarily centered on language. Since the core of medical practice is the clinical encounter, it is essential to understand how language, in its discursive function, aligns with rational and empirical knowledge, as well as with the subjects involved in this dialogical relationship. Our analysis begins with a critique of the Kantian model—which considers language merely as a vehicle—drawing particularly on Humboldt’s insights. This perspective is then integrated with epistemological theories and recent theoretical developments from a hermeneutic-phenomenological framework, aiming to map out the medical sciences and their associated discourses. This approach will not only clarify the role of language in medicine but also incorporate insights from other fields of knowledge relevant to healthcare practices. Ultimately, this characterization could pave the way for a general theory of communication in health, fostering a deeper understanding and enhancing interactions between healthcare professionals and their patients—making them, more inclusive and humane.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barreto, M. D. S., Nascimento, D. G. D., Magini, L. Y. Z., Oliveira, I. L. D., Vieira, V. C. D. L., & Marcon, S. S. (2019). Discourse of nurses and doctors on the use of the emergency service by immigrants. Esc. Anna Nery, 23(2), e20180266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2019-0003

Beisecker, A. E. (1990). Patient power in doctor-patient communication: What do we know? Health Communication, 2(2), 105–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0202_4

Carel, H. (2016). Phenomenology of illness. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669653.001.0001

Carelli, F. B., Lens, A. F., Oliveira, A. C. C. A., Santos, A. C., Reis, M., & Pompilio, C. E. (2013). Hidra de duas cabeças: Configuração ricoeuriana e narrador impuro numa narrativa do HC-FMUSP. Revista Internacional de Humanidades Médicas, 2(2), 15–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revmedica.v2.1312

Charon, R. (2006). Narrative medicine: Honoring the stories of illness. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195166750.001.0001

Cocks N, Dipper L, Middleton R, Morgan G. What can iconic gestures tell us about the language system? A case of conduction aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Jul-Aug;46(4):423-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13682822.2010.520813

Derrida, J. (1998). Los fines del hombre. In Márgenes de la filosofía (C. González Marín, Trans., pp. 145–174). Cátedra.

Descartes, R. (1999). Meditações sobre filosofia primeira (F. Castilho, Trans.). Cemodecon – IFCH-Unicamp. (Original work published 1641).

Dipper L, Pritchard M, Morgan G, Cocks N. The language-gesture connection: Evidence from aphasia. Clin Linguist Phon. 2015;29(8-10):748-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1036462

Foucault, M. (2001). The order of things (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Frank, A. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. University of Chi-cago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226260037.001.0001

Heath, C. (1992). The delivery and reception of diagnosis in general-practice consultation. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 235–267). Cambridge University Press.

Heidegger, M., Stambaugh, J., & Schmidt, D. J. (2010). Being and time. State University of New York Press.

Hofmann, B. (2002). On the triad disease, illness and sickness. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(6), 651–673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.27.6.651.13793

Humboldt, W. von. (1990). Sobre la diversidad de la estructura del lenguaje humano y su influencia sobre el desarrollo espiritual de la humanidad (A. Agud, Trans. & Intro.). Anthropos.

Hurwitz, B. Bates V. (2016). The Roots and Ramifications of Narrative in Modern Medi-cine. In: Whitehead A WA, Atkinson S, et al., editors, editor. The Edinburgh Com-panion to the Critical Medical Humanities. Edinburgh (UK): Edinburgh University Press.

Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations (Vol. II, J. N. Findlay, Trans.; D. Moran, Ed.). Routledge. (Original work published 1901) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420034

Hydén, L. C., & Mishler, E. G. (1999). Language and medicine. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 174–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190093

Kant, I. (1998). Crítica da razão pura (M. P. dos Santos, Trans.; A. F. Morujão, Intro. & Notes). Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. (Original work published 1781)

Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing, and the human condition. Basic Books.

Lacan, J. (1972). Du discours psychanalytique. In G. B. Contri (Ed.), Lacan in Italia 1953–1978. En Italie Lacan (pp. 32–55). La Salamandra.

Lafont, C. (1999). The linguistic turn in hermeneutic philosophy (J. Medina, Trans.). MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4249.001.0001

Maynard, D. W. (1991). The perspective-display series and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 164–192). Polity Press.

Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Ablex.

Nietzsche, F. (1997). Daybreak: Thoughts on the prejudices of morality (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.; M. Clark & B. Leiter, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812040.005

Nordenfelt, L. (1994). On the disease, illness and sickness distinction: A commentary on Andrew Twaddle’s system of concepts. In A. Twaddle & L. Nordenfelt (Eds.), Dis-ease, illness and sickness: Three central concepts in the theory of health (pp. 19–36). Linköping: Studies on Health and Society, 18.

Ong, L. M. L., De Haes, J. C. J. M., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995). Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 40(7), 903–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-M

Pompilio, C. E. (2016). Comunicação em saúde: Habermas e Lévinas no consultório. Via Atlântica, 17(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.11606/va.v0i17.108322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/va.v0i29.108322

Pompilio, C. E., & Caputo, E. (2022). Linguagem, saúde e doença em Bartleby, o escriturá-rio de Herman Melville. Revista Metalinguagens, 9(1), 25–42.

Segatto, A. I. (2009). Sobre pensamento e linguagem: Wilhelm von Humboldt. Trans/Form/Ação, 32(1), 193–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732009000100012

ten Have, P. (1991). Talk and institution: A reconsideration of the “asymmetry” of doctor-patient interaction. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social struc-ture: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 138–163). Polity Press.

Twaddle, A. (1968). Influence and illness: Definitions and definers of illness behavior among older males in Providence, Rhode Island (Doctoral dissertation). Brown Uni-versity.

Twaddle, A. (1994). Disease, illness and sickness revisited. In A. Twaddle & L. Norden-felt (Eds.), Disease, illness and sickness: Three central concepts in the theory of health (pp. 1–18). Linköping: Studies on Health and Society.

Viola, T. (2011). Philosophy and the second person: Peirce, Humboldt, Benveniste, and personal pronouns as universals of communication. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 47(4), 389–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.47.4.389

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Basil Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-08

How to Cite

Intersubjectivity and language in the clinical encounter: Towards a theory of communication in health. (2025). Journal 2i: Identity and Intermediality Studies, 7(12), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.21814/2i.6450

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.