Itinerant Curriculum Theory: Fulfilling the ethos of the Carnation Revolution

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/childstudies.6082

Keywords:

Itinerant Curriculum Theory, Curriculum Epistemicide, Curriculum Involution, Eugenics, Theorycide

Abstract

Five decades after April, where do we find ourselves as pedagogues and curriculum theorists? What progress has been made, and what challenges still lie ahead? A question of such magnitude will not fit in an essay of this nature. Aware of this obstacle, this article crafts a broad and varied picture of achievements and setbacks that characterized education post-April 25th. The essay focuses on emblematic epistemological cathartics between hegemonic and counter-hegemonic traditions and within the latter that have been unable to devitalize the field’s historical epistemicidal nerve - maculating the democratic spirit of education, curriculum, and teacher preparation programs. The article describes how these shakeups trigger a theoretical imparity and involution in the field, intimately related to some of the most egregious social challenges the nation is facing – immigration, climate change, poverty, and inequality, among others. The essay ends by advocating an itinerant curricular theory as a pedagogical proposal that responds to humanity’s diversity and epistemological differences.

Author Biography

João M. Paraskeva, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

João M. Paraskeva is an Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Professor at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. Before joining Strathclyde, he was a Professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, the founding chair of the Department of Educational Leadership, and the Graduate Program Director of the Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies (Ed.D./Ph.D.)

References

Angulo Rasco, J. F. (2024). The itinerant curriculum theory in the Chilean context of curriculum control and standardization: Toward a constituent–itinerant–curriculum. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence (pp. 81–96). New York: Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350293014.0012

Anzaldúa, G. (2007). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.

Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203241219

Arendt, H. (2004). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Meridian Books.

Arrighi, G. (2005). The long twentieth century. New York: Verso.

Althusser, L. (1990). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Ambedkar, B. (2016). Annihilation of caste. In A. Roy (Ed.), Annihilation of caste. London: Verso.

Augé, M. (2003). Não-lugares: Introdução a uma antropologia da supermodernidade. Campinas: Papirus Editora.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baudelot, C., & Estabelet, R. (1998). El nivel educativo sube. Madrid: Morata.

Bennett, W. (1994). The de-valuing of America: The fight for our culture and our children. New York: HarperCollins.

Biesta, G., Filippakou, O., Wainwright, E., & Aldridge, D. (2019). Why educational research should not just resolve problems, but should cause them as well. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3509

Cabral, A. (1969). Revolution in Guinea Bissau. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Chou, T. (2017). Chuang Tse. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água.

Cockburn, A., & Blackburn, R. (1970). Student power. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Couto, M. (2008). Terra sonâmbula. Lisboa: Leya.

Cox, C. B., & Dyson, A. E. (1969). The fight for education. Back Paper 1, Critical Quarterly.

Crato, N. (2006). O eduquês em discurso directo. Lisboa: Gradiva.

Dabashi, H. (2015). Can non-Europeans think? London: Zed Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350218840

Darder, A. (2016). Ruthlessness and the forging of liberatory epistemologies: An arduous journey. In J. M. Paraskeva, Curriculum epistemicides (pp. ix–xvi). New York: Routledge.

Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Dussel, E. (1995). The invention of the Americas: Eclipse of the “Other” and the myth of modernity. New York: Continuum.

Eagleton, T. (2003). After theory. New York: Basic Books.

Ela, J. M. (2013). Restituir a história às sociedades africanas. Lisboa: Edições Pedago.

Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250

Escobar, A. (2013). Words and knowledges otherwise. In W. Mignolo & A. Escobar (Eds.), Globalization and the decolonial turn (pp. 33–64). New York: Routledge.

Flesch, R. (1955). Why Johnny can’t read. New York: Joanna Cotler Books.

Flores, M. A. (2016). Teacher education curriculum. In J. Loughran & M. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 187–230). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_5

Formosinho, J. (1998). Currículo comum: Pronto a vestir de tamanho único. Braga: Universidade do Minho.

Gaztambide-Fernandez, R. (2020). The absent-present curriculum, or how to stop pretending not to know. Curriculum Inquiry, 52(4), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2022.2135881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2022.2135881

Gil, J. (1998). Metamorphoses of the body. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Gil, J. (2010). O devir-eu de Fernando Pessoa. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água.

Gil, J. (2018). Caos e ritmo. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água.

Giroux, H. (1981). Ideology, culture, and the process of schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Gore, J. (1992). The struggle for pedagogies. New York: Routledge.

Gough, N. (2000). Locating curriculum studies in the global village. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202700182790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/002202700182790

Grosfoguel, R. (2018). Decolonizing Western universalisms. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Toward a just curriculum theory: The epistemicide (pp. 147–164). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146904-6

Hall, S. (1997). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In S. Hall & P. D. Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage Publications.

Han, B.-C. (2018). A expulsão do outro. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água.

Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381181

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001

Hemingway, E. (2013). The sun also rises. New York: Important Books.

Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1999). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York: Anchor Books.

Huebner, D. (1959). From classroom action to educational outcomes: An exploration in educational theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Huebner, D. (1966). Curricular language and classroom meanings. In J. Macdonald & R. Leeper (Eds.), Language and meaning (pp. 8–26). Washington: ASCD.

Jal, M. (2023). Epistemological untouchability: The deafening silence of Indian academics. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Critical perspectives on the denial of caste in educational debate: Towards a non-derivative curriculum reason (pp. 257–328). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003155065-8

Jameson, F. (2016). American utopia: Dual power and the universal army. New York: Verso.

Janson, E., & Paraskeva, J. M. (2015). Curriculum counter-strokes and strokes: Swimming in non-existent epistemological rivers. Policy Futures in Education, 13(8), 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315579981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315579981

Jin, H. (2008). The writer as migrant. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226399904.001.0001

Jupp, J. (2017). Decolonizing and de-canonizing curriculum studies. Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14288/jaaacs.v12i1.189706

Jupp, J. (2023). Itinerant curriculum theory. New York: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b20936

Kafka, F. (2017). The metamorphosis. New York: Empire Books.

Khalfa, J. (1999). Introduction. In J. Khalfa (Ed.), An introduction to the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze (pp. 1–6). London: Continuum.

Kliebard, H. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum. New York: Routledge.

Liston, D. (1998). Capitalist schools: Explanation and ethics in radical studies of schooling. New York: Routledge.

Lorde, A. (2007). Sister outsider. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.

Macdonald, J. (1971). Curriculum theory. Journal of Educational Research, 64(5), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1971.10884138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1971.10884138

Magalhães, A., & Stoer, S. (1998). Orgulhosamente filhos de Rousseau. Porto: Profedições.

Maldonado-Torres, N. (2018). Against decoloniality: On the meaning and significance of the decolonial turn. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Toward a just curriculum theory: The epistemicide (pp. 165–180). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146904-7

Mallon, F. (2012). Decolonizing native histories. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478092148

McLaren, P. (1989). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York: Longman.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). The prose of the world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jqbw

Mignolo, W. (2013). Introduction: Coloniality of power and decolonial thinking. In W. Mignolo & A. Escobar (Eds.), Globalization and the decolonial turn (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315868448

Monica, M. F. (2011). Entrevista a Maria Filomena Mónica por Luísa Schmidt. Análise Social, 46(200), 552–563.

Moreira, M. A. (2017). ‘And the linguistic minorities suffer what they must?’ A review of conflicts in curriculum theory through the lenses of language teacher education. Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14288/jaaacs.v12i1.189710

Mounier, E. (1938). Personalism. New York: Longmans.

Nico, J. B. (2021). Universidade Popular Túlio Espanca/Universidade de Évora: Uma rede de educação não formal e intergeracional no Alentejo. Évora: Universidade de Évora. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/Universidade-Popular-Tulio-Espanca

Nkrumah, K. (1964). Consciencism: Philosophy and ideology for de-colonization and development with particular reference to the African revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Nóvoa, A. (2005). Evidentemente: Histórias da educação. Porto: ASA.

Nóvoa, A. (2015). Aprendizagem não é saber muito. Carta Capital. Retrieved from https://www.cartacapital.com.br/educacao/antonio-novoa-aprendizagem-nao-e-saber-muito

Nussbaum, M. (1998). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjghth8

O’Brien, M., & Penna, S. (1999). Theorizing welfare. London: Sage.

Oliveira, I. (2017). Itinerant curriculum theory against the epistemicide: A dialogue between the thinking of Santos and Paraskeva. Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14288/jaaacs.v12i1.189708

Pacheco, J., & Pacheco, M. (2018). Escola da Ponte: Uma escola pública em debate. Porto Alegre: Cortez.

Paraskeva, J. M. (2007). Ideologia, cultura e currículo. Porto: Didáctica.

Paraskeva, J. M. (2009). Unaccomplished utopia: Neoliberal dismantling of higher education in Europe. London: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087908492

Paraskeva, J. M. (2011). Conflicts in curriculum theory: Challenging hegemonic epistemologies (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119628

Paraskeva, J. M. (2013). The need for a higher education carnival. Policy Futures in Education, 11(5), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.5.637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.5.637

Paraskeva, J. M. (2015). Colonized colonialism(s): A Calibanian prosperity or a prospering Caliban. International Journal of Curriculum and Social Justice, 1(1), 107–154.

Paraskeva, J. M. (2016). Curriculum epistemicides [Preface by Antonia Darder]. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734781

Paraskeva, J. M. (2018). Toward a just curriculum theory: The epistemicide. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146904

Paraskeva, J. M. (2019a). ¿Qué sucede con la teoría crítica (urriculum)? La necesidad de sobrellevar la rabia neoliberal sin evitarla. In R. V. Recio (Comp.), Reconocimiento y bien común en educación (pp. 191–230). Madrid: Morata.

Paraskeva, J. M. (2019b). Itinerant curriculum theory: An epistemological declaration of independence. Qurriculum: Revista de Teoría, Investigación y Práctica Educativa, 23, 31–47. tps://doi.org/10.25145/j.qurricul.2020.33.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25145/j.qurricul.2020.33.03

Paraskeva, J. M. (2021a). Curriculum and the generation of utopia. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025771

Paraskeva, J. M. (2021b). Did COVID-19 exist before the scientists? Toward curriculum theory now! Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1888288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1888288

Paraskeva, J. M. (2022a). Conflicts in curriculum theory: Challenging hegemonic epistemologies (2nd ed.) [Preface by Dwayne Huebner]. New York: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77420-2

Paraskeva, J. M. (2022b). The original sin: A critique of the curriculum reason: Towards a non-derivative critical curriculum reason. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), The curriculum: A new comprehensive reader (pp. 1–62). New York: Peter Lang.

Paraskeva, J. M. (2022c). Itinerant curriculum theory: The “heterotopian” logic: Challenging curriculum involution and occidentosis. In W. Zhao, T. Popkewitz, & T. Autio (Eds.), Epistemic colonialism and the transfer of curriculum knowledge across borders: Applying a historical lens to contest unilateral logics (pp. 45–66). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323027-5

Paraskeva, J. M. (2022d). The generation of the utopia: Itinerant curriculum theory toward a “futurable future.” Discourses: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(4), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2022.2030594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2022.2030594

Paraskeva, J. M. (2023a). On curriculum and spirituality: Itinerant curriculum theory and the struggle for non-derivative curriculum “langue” and “parole.” In R. Venturini (Ed.), Curriculum, spirituality, and human rights (pp. 2–57). Boston: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004549968_001

Paraskeva, J. M. (2023b). Critical perspectives on the denial of caste in educational debate: Towards a non-derivative curriculum reason. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003155065

Paraskeva, J. M., & Huebner, D. E. (2023). Dialectical materialism: An alternative way of thinking and doing education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2207627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2207627

Paraskeva, J. M., & Macrine, S. (2015). Neoliberal pedagogy of debt vs. debtor pedagogy: The new neoliberal commodities. In M. A. Peters, J. M. Paraskeva, & T. Besley (Eds.), The global financial crisis and educational restructuring. New York: Peter Lang.

Paraskeva, J. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2019). Itinerant curriculum theory in the making. In A. Raiker, M. Rautiainen, & B. Saqipi (Eds.), Teacher education and the development of democratic citizenship in Europe (pp. 9–19). New York: Routledge.

Péguy, C. (2001). Temporal and eternal. New York: Liberty Fund.

Pessoa, F. (2014). O livro do desassossego. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim.

Pinar, W. (2000). Introduction: Toward the internationalization of curriculum studies. In D. Trueit, W. Doll Jr., H. Wang, & W. Pinar (Eds.), The internationalization of curriculum studies (pp. 1–13). New York: Peter Lang.

Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Pinar, W. (2013). Curriculum studies in the United States: Present circumstances, intellectual histories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303424_2

Pires, E. L. (1987). O ensino superior é quem mais ordena. Braga: Universidade do Minho.

Popkewitz, T. (1978). Educational research: Values and visions of a social order. Theory and Research in Social Education, 4(4), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1978.10506043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1978.10506043

Quijano, A. (1991). Colonialidad y modernidad/racionalidad. Perú Indígena, 29(1), 11–21.

Rasco, J. F. A. (2021). Neoliberalismo progressista: Quando os solucionadores são parte do problema. Le Monde Diplomatique. Retrieved from https://www.lemondediplomatique.cl/neoliberalismo-progresista-cuando-los-solucionadores-son-parte-del-problema-por.html

Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York: Simon & Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607935-13

Recwitz, A., & Rosa, H. (2023). Late modernity in crisis. London: Polity.

Rickover, H. (1959). Education and freedom. New York: E. P. Dutton.

Said, E. (2005). Reconsiderando a teoria itinerante. In M. Sanches (Org.), Deslocalizar a Europa: Antropologia, arte, literatura e história na pós-colonialidade (pp. 25–42). Lisboa: Cotovia.

Santos, B. de S. (1995). Toward a new commonsense. New York: Routledge.

Santos, B. de S. (1999). Porque é tão difícil construir uma teoria crítica? Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 54(Junho), 197–215.

Santos, B. de S. (2007a). Another knowledge is possible. London: Verso.

Santos, B. de S. (2007b). Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledges. Review, 30(1), 45–89. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40241677

Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm.

Santos, B. de S. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002000

Saramago, J. (2009). Death at intervals. London: Vintage Books.

Schubert, W. (2017). Growing curriculum studies: Contributions of João M. Paraskeva. Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14288/jaaacs.v12i1.189714

Süssekind, M. (2017). Against epistemological fascism: A reading of Paraskeva’s itinerant curriculum theory. Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14288/jaaacs.v12i1.189707

Trueit, D. (2000). Democracy and conversation. In D. Trueit, W. Doll Jr., H. Wang, & W. Pinar (Eds.), The internationalization of curriculum studies (pp. ix–xvii). New York: Peter Lang.

Tse-Tung, M. (2007). Oppose book worship. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Slavoj Žižek presents Mao on practice and contradiction (pp. 43–51). London: Verso.

Vieira, F., & Moreira, M. (2011). Supervisão e avaliação do desempenho docente. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.

Walkerdine, V. (1992). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.

Walsh, C. (2012). ‘Other’ knowledges, ‘other’ critiques: Reflections on the politics and practices of philosophy and decoloniality in the Other America. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(3), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5070/T413012880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/T413012880

Wexler, P. (1987). Social analysis of education. New York: Routledge.

Williams, R. (2013). The long revolution. London: Verso.

Zhao, W. (2019). China’s education, curriculum knowledge and cultural inscriptions: Dancing with the wind. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315225845

Žižek, S. (2019). The relevance of the Communist Manifesto. London: Polity Press.

Žižek, S. (2024). Monitor or punish? Yes, please. Philosophical Salon. Retrieved from https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/monitor-and-punish-yes-please

Downloads

Published

16-12-2024

How to Cite

Paraskeva, J. M. . (2024). Itinerant Curriculum Theory: Fulfilling the ethos of the Carnation Revolution. Child Studies, (5), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.21814/childstudies.6082

Issue

Section

Articles