Gosseries and the Problem of Future People

Authors

  • Andrew Pavelich University of Houston-Downtown

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.9.1.6434

Keywords:

Gosseries, Future People, Metaphysics of time

Abstract

Gosseries argues that we have moral duties to future people, since we should not discriminate against people based on when they live—that all people, at all times, have an equal right to the basic requirements of a good life. I argue that in making this claim Gosseries is committed to the real existence of these future people, and in making this commitment he is also committed to a metaphysical view where the future is fixed and unchanging. This introduces a problem that Gosseries does not address: that a fixed future makes any kind of moral deliberation pointless.

References

Bruneau, G. (2018). Do We Have Moral Obligations Towards Future People? Addressing the moral vagueness of future environmental scenarios. Veritas, 40, 49-65.

Gosseries, A. (2023). What is Intergenerational Justice? Polity press.

McKie, J. (2001). Thinking About Possible People: A comment on Tooley and Rachels. Bioethics, 15 (2), 146-156.

Reiman, J. (2007). Being Fair to Future People: The Non-Identity Problem in the Original Position. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (1), 69-92.

Scheffler, S. (2013). Death and the Afterlife. Oxford University Press.

Wallace, R.J. (2021). Humanity as an Object of Attachment. Inquiry, 64 (7), 686-698.

Downloads

Published

27-07-2026

Issue

Section

Thinking for the Future: Gosseries and His Critics

How to Cite

Gosseries and the Problem of Future People. (2026). Ethics, Politics & Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.9.1.6434

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.