Gosseries and the Problem of Future People
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.9.1.6434Keywords:
Gosseries, Future People, Metaphysics of timeAbstract
Gosseries argues that we have moral duties to future people, since we should not discriminate against people based on when they live—that all people, at all times, have an equal right to the basic requirements of a good life. I argue that in making this claim Gosseries is committed to the real existence of these future people, and in making this commitment he is also committed to a metaphysical view where the future is fixed and unchanging. This introduces a problem that Gosseries does not address: that a fixed future makes any kind of moral deliberation pointless.
References
Bruneau, G. (2018). Do We Have Moral Obligations Towards Future People? Addressing the moral vagueness of future environmental scenarios. Veritas, 40, 49-65.
Gosseries, A. (2023). What is Intergenerational Justice? Polity press.
McKie, J. (2001). Thinking About Possible People: A comment on Tooley and Rachels. Bioethics, 15 (2), 146-156.
Reiman, J. (2007). Being Fair to Future People: The Non-Identity Problem in the Original Position. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (1), 69-92.
Scheffler, S. (2013). Death and the Afterlife. Oxford University Press.
Wallace, R.J. (2021). Humanity as an Object of Attachment. Inquiry, 64 (7), 686-698.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrew Pavelich

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
