Can a Positive Social Discount Rate Be Fair to the Future? On the Primacy of Practical Reason

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.9.1.6502

Keywords:

Discounting, Valuing, Scheffler, Impartiality, Reciprocity

Abstract

In the paper I argue that social discounting of the future fails, in more general terms, because by focusing on existence or time distance, neglects the fact that future generations are participants in the same chain of human succession. Making use of Gosseries’ discussion in the book What is Intergenerational Justice? I argue that existence and time distance are morally irrelevant factors, because human succession is mapped on the structure of our practical rationality, and particularly on the notion of valuing per se. By criticizing Gosseries’ insistence on impartiality, I argue first that valuing is a diachronic enterprise that necessitates the fact that human generations should exist, something that creates certain duties of sufficientarian justice. Second, I argue that valuing is also a synchronic enterprise, unveiled in our attachment to fellow people that interact with us in the here and now, something that also creates special duties of justice to them.

References

Arrow, K.J. (1999). Discounting, morality and gaming. In P.R. Portney & J.P. Weyant (eds.), Discounting & Intergenerational Equity, (pp. 13-22). Routledge.

Caney, S. (2009). Climate Change and the Future: Discounting for Time, Wealth, and Risk. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2), 163-186.

Gosseries, A. (2023). What is Intergenerational Justice? Polity Press.

Gosseries, A. (2014). Nations, Generations and Climate Justice. Global Policy 5(1), 96-112.

Koukouzelis, K. (2020). Global justice & equality. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer.

Lehman, L. (2002). On Becoming Extinct. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 83, 253-269.

Mogensen, A.L. (2022). The only ethical argument for positive δ? Partiality and pure time preference. Philosophical Studies. 179, 2731-2750.

Nagel, T. (2005). The problem of global justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 33(2), 113-147

Rawls, J. (2001). The Law of Peoples with the ‘Idea of public reason revisited’. Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (revised ed). Harvard University Press.

Sangiovanni, A. (2007). Global Justice, Reciprocity and the State. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 35(1), 3-39.

Sanklecha, P. (2017). Our obligations to future generations: the limits of intergenerational justice and the necessity of the ethics of metaphysics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 47 (2-3), 229-245.

Scheffler, S. (2018). Why Worry about Future Generations. Oxford University Press.

Scheffler, S. (2013). Death & the Afterlife. Oxford University Press.

Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Report. Cambridge University Press.

Viscusi, W.K. (2023). The Social Discount Rate: Legal and Philosophical Underpinnings. Annual Review of Financial Economics. 15, 127-145.

Downloads

Published

27-07-2026

Issue

Section

Thinking for the Future: Gosseries and His Critics

How to Cite

Can a Positive Social Discount Rate Be Fair to the Future? On the Primacy of Practical Reason. (2026). Ethics, Politics & Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.9.1.6502

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.