A POLITICS WITHOUT COMPROMISE: THE YOUNG HEGELIANS AND POLITICS

Authors

  • Vivien García Université Grenoble Alpes, Philosophie, Pratiques & Langages – PPL EA 3699

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.95

Keywords:

Young Hegelianism, compromise, dialectics, “juste milieu”

Abstract

This article aims at exploring how most of the Young Hegelians came to reject all forms of compromise. It will first show how Young Hegelianism itself was born from a process of radicalisation. Then, it will expound some of the theoretical developments that this process produced and explain why and how all forms of compromise came to be rejected. For Young Hegelians, a compromise is an antidialectical position. It consists in the adoption of a median posture, which does not correspond with a real mediation. It is a way of deflating conflicts and, more precisely, to avoid the oppositions at work in history being unveiled in their purity.

References

Angaut, J.-C. (2007). Bakounine jeune hégélien: La philosophie et son dehors. Lyon: ENS éditions. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.enseditions.111

Angaut, J.-C., Buée, J.-M., Clochec, P., & Renault, E. (2015). De la Jeune Allemagne au jeune hégélianisme. In F. Engels, Écrits de jeunesse (1839–1842) (pp. 7–98). Paris: Éditions sociales.

Bakunin, M. (2015). The Reaction in Germany: A Fragment of a Frenchman. Online. Retrieved from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/mikhail-bakunin-the-reaction-ingermany (Original work published 1842)

Bauer, B. (1989). The Trumpet of the Last Judgement against Hegel the Atheist and Antichrist. An Ultimatum. (L. S. Stepelevich, Trans.). Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press. (Original work published 1841)

Bauer, E. (1842). Bruno Bauer und seine Gegner. Berlin: Jonas Verlagsbuchhandlung.

Clochec, P. (2014). Le libéralisme de Marx. Actuel Marx, (56), 109–123. Retrieved from www.cairn.info/revue-actuel-marx-2014-2-page-109.htm DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.056.0109

Clochec, P. (2018). Marx jeune hégélien, 1841–1844 (PhD in Philosophy). École Normale supérieure de Lyon.

Engels, F. (2010). Diary of a Guest student. In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected Works (Vol. 2, pp. 270–273). Londres: Lawrence & Wishart. (Original

work published 1842)

García, V. (2018). Le sort de la philosophie :Quatre parcours de jeunes hégéliens (Bakounine, Engels, Marx, Stirner). Paris: Hermann.

Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. (F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1830). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. Heidelberg: Osswald.

Heine, H. (1856). De l’Allemagne (Vol. 2). Paris: Michel Lévy frères. Retrieved from https://books.google.es/books?id=HI8xAQAAMAAJ

Leo, H. (1838). Die Hegelingen: Aktenstücke und Belege zu der s. g. Denunciation der ewigen Wahrheit. Halle: Eduard Anton. Retrieved from

https://books.google.fr/books?id=jShOAAAAcAAJ

Luft, E. van der. (2006). Edgar Bauer and the Origins of the Theory of Terrorism. In D. Moggach (Ed.), The New Hegelians: Politics and Philosophy in the Hegelian School (pp. 236–165). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498664.007

Marx, K. (2010). Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law. Introduction. In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected Works (Vol. 3, pp. 175–

. Londres: Lawrence & Wishart. (Original work published 1844)

Marx, K. (2010). Difference Between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature. In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected Works (Vol. 1, pp. 25–107). Londres: Lawrence & Wishart. (Original work published 1841)

Moggach, D. (2006). Republican Rigorism and Emancipation in Bruno Bauer. In D. Moggach (Ed.), The New Hegelians: Politics and Philosophy in the Hegelian School (pp. 114–135). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498664.006

Moggach, D. (2007). The Philosophy and Politics of Bruno Bauer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ruge, A. (1841). Vorwort. Hallische Jahrbücher für deutsche Wissenschaft und Kunst, (1). Retrieved from https://books.google.fr/books?id=FCRPAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=es&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Ruge, A. (1842). Die Hegelsche Rechtsphilosophie Und Die Politik Unsrer Zeit. Deutsche Jahrbücher Für Wissenschaft Und Kunst, (189–190–191–192). Retrieved from https://books.google.fr/books?id=I5ZTAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=es&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Strauss, D. F. (1837). Streitschriften zur Verteidigung meiner Schrift über das Leben Jesu und zur Charakteristik der Gegenwärtigen Theologie. Tübingen: Osiander.

Taillandier, S.-R. (1848). Histoire de la Jeune Allemagne. Paris: A. Franck.

Tomba, M. (2006). Exclusiveness and Political Universalism in Bruno Bauer. In D. Moggach (Ed.), The New Hegelians: Politics and Philosophy in the Hegelian School (pp. 91–113). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498664.005

Downloads

Published

29-09-2023

How to Cite

García, V. . (2023). A POLITICS WITHOUT COMPROMISE: THE YOUNG HEGELIANS AND POLITICS. Ethics, Politics & Society, 2, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.95