JUSTIFYING CIVIL DESOBEDIENCE IN A POSITIVIST APPROACH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.188

Keywords:

Real Definition, Hart, Civil Disobedience, Pathologies of a Legal System, Hannah Arendt

Abstract

This paper’s goal is to demonstrate that civil disobedience can be treated as a valid form of dissent in a positivist approach to legal philosophy. Two possible objections emerge against our proposal: the fact that (1) the positivist perspective could not allow appeals deriving from social causes to influence the legal system and, for that reason, (2) civil disobedience could only be regarded as a potential pathology of the legal system. We shall argue that these two objections are mistaken. To that end we will make use of concepts coined by H. L. Hart. With them we will demonstrate that the claims forwarded through civil disobedience actually presuppose the existence of a legal system. For this reason, it cannot present the above risk.

References

Adverse, H. (2012). Arendt, a democracia e a desobediência civil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos, 105, 409–434. https://doi.org/10.9732/P.0034-7191.2012v105p409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9732/P.0034-7191.2012v105p409

Austin, J. (1995). The province of jurisprudence determined. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521546

Arendt, H. (1972). Civil Disobedience. In Crisis of the Republic (pp. 51–101). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Arendt, H. (2013). A condição humana (R. Raposo, Trad., 11.ª ed.). Forense Universitária.

Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2005). Wittgenstein: Understanding and meaning. Part I. Wiley-Blackwell.

Cannon, M. (1989). Civil disobedience: Moral prerogative or lawless act. Lake Forest College Publications, 5(1), 5–18.

Carvalho, J. B. C. L. (2012). A desobediência civil no pensamento político de Hannah Arendt: Um direito fundamental. Espaco Jurídico, 13(1), 55–66.

Coleman, J. L., & Leiter, B. (2010). Legal positivism. In D. Patterson (Ed.), A companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (2.ª ed., pp. 228–248). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch14

Dworkin, R. M. (1967). The model of rules. The University of Chicago Law Review, 35(1), 14–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1598947

Endicott, T. (2016). Law and Language. In N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/law-language/

Fatturi, A. (2020). O conceito de “jogos de linguagem” nas Investigações Filosóficas. In L. P. Júnior, B. Valle & H. L. Martinez (Eds.), Wittgenstein: Perspectivas. EDITORA CRV.

Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy. Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253884.001.0001

Hart, H. L. A. (1994a). The concept of law (2.ª ed.). Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1994b). O conceito de direito (A. R. Mendes, Trad., 3.ª ed.). Editora Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

Kuusela, O. (2011). The development of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. In M. Mcginn, & O. Kuusela (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199287505.001.0001

Lefebvre, A. (2011). Law and the ordinary: Hart, Wittgenstein, Jurisprudence. TELOS, 154, 99–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3817/0311154099

Payne, M. (1967). Hart’s Concept of a Legal System. William and Mary Law Review, 18(2), 287–319.

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582

Rawls, J. (2000). Uma teoria da justiça (A. Pisetta & L. M. R. Esteves, Trads.). Martins Fontes.

Thoreau, H. D. (2015). Civil disobedience. In B. P. Taylot (Ed.), The Routledge Guidebook to Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience (pp. 189–215). Routledge.

Wittgenstein, L. (1998). The Collected Works of Ludwig Wittgenstein: Notebooks 1914-1916 (G. E. M Anscombe, Trad., 2.ª ed.). Basil Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Wittgenstein’s lectures, Cambridge, 1932–1935: From the notes of Alice Ambrose and Margaret Macdonald. Prometheus Books.

Wittgenstein, L. (2015). Tratado lógico-filosófico & Investigações Filosóficas (M. S. Lourenço, Trad., 6.ª ed.). Editora Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2023

How to Cite

Nascimento, M. C. do . (2023). JUSTIFYING CIVIL DESOBEDIENCE IN A POSITIVIST APPROACH. Ethics, Politics & Society, 4, 46–68. https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.188

Issue

Section

Original Articles