WHAT SHOULD WOMEN DO? THE STOICS ON GENDER-ROLE DIVISION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.192%20Keywords:
appropriate activity, division of labor, gender, Stoics, womanhood, καθῆκονAbstract
The aim of this paper is to enquire if the Stoics consider certain social activities appropriate only for men or women, a much-debated question in the scholarship. Here it is argued that the Stoics are not committed to gendered divisions of tasks. This claim is pled through an analysis of the various testimonies and of the Stoic notion of appropriate activity (καθῆκον). This result leads to reconsider the Stoics’ stand within their cultural environment and will hopefully contribute to the debate on their thinking on womanhood. This study is thus structured: firstly, the notion of καθῆκον is presented; next, the evidence of the Stoic use of gender as a parameter in determining καθήκοντα is discussed; then, a reconstruction of the social role the early Stoics assigned to women in their planned constitutions is attempted; finally, the reflection of later Stoics on the role of women in actual societies is addressed.
References
Alden, M. (2003). Ancient Greek Dress. Costume, 37(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1179/cos.2003.37.1.1
Asmis, E. (1996). The Stoics on women. In J. K. Ward (Ed.), Feminism and ancient philosophy (pp. 68–92). Routledge.
Baldry, H. C. (1959). Zeno’s ideal State. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 79, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/627917
Baloglu, C. P. (1992). Αἱ οἰκονομικαὶ ἀντιλήψεις τῶν Στωϊκῶν Ἱεροκλέους καὶ Μουσωνίου. Platon, 44, 122–34.
Banateanu, A. (2001). La théorie stoïcienne de l’amitié. Essai de reconstruction. Cerf.
Barberá, P. G. (1985). ¿Mujer, matrimonio e hijos en el Estoicismo antiguo bajo el amparo de Eros? Emerita, 53(2), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.1985.v53.i2.678
Barney, R. (2003). A puzzle in Stoic ethics. In D. Sedley (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 24 (pp. 303–340). Clarendon Press.
Bonhöffer, A. F. (1894). Die Ethik des Stoikers Epiktets. Enke.
Brennan, T. (2014). The kathekon: A report on some recent work at Cornell. Philosophie antique, 14, 41–70. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.748
Brunt, P. A. (2013). Studies in Stoicism. OUP.
Cantarella, E. (2005). Gender, sexuality and law. In M. Gagarin & D. Cohen (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Greek law (pp. 236–253). CUP.
Chroust, A.-H. (1965). The ideal polity of the early Stoics: Zeno’s Republic. The Review of Politics, 27(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500006896
Cohen, D. (1987). The legal status and political role of women in Plato’s Laws. Revue Internationale des Droits de l’Antiquité, 34, 27–40.
Croom, A. T. (2010). Roman clothing and fashion. Amberley.
Dawson, D. (1992). Cities of the Gods. Communist utopias in Greek thought. OUP.
De Lacy, P. H. (1977). The four Stoic personae. Illinois Classical Studies, 2, 163–172.
Dean-Jones, L. (1991). The cultural construct of the female body in classical Greek science. In S. B. Pomeroy (Ed.), Women’s history and ancient history (pp. 111–137). UNCP.
Decleva Caizzi, F. (Ed.). (1966). Antisthenis Fragmenta. Istituto Editoriale Cisalpino.
Demont, P. (1993). Le loisir dans la Politique d’Aristote. In P. Aubenque & A. Tordesillas (Eds.), Aristote politique. Études sur la Politique d’Aristote. (pp. 210–230). PUF.
Destrée, P. (2013). Education, leisure and politics. In M. Deslauriers & P. Destrée (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle’s Politics (pp. 301–323). CUP.
Dorandi, T. (1982). Filodemo, Gli Stoici (PHerc. 155 e 339). Cronache Ercolanesi, 12, 91–133.
Dover, K. J. (1973). Classical Greek attitudes to sexual behaviour. Arethusa, 6(1), 59–73.
Dudley, D. R. (1937). A history of Cynicism from Diogenes to the 6th century a. D. Meuthen & Co.
Edmondson, J. C., & Keith, A. (2008). Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture. UTP.
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1986). Discovering the good: oikeiōsis and kathēkonta in Stoic ethics. In M. Schofield & G. Striker (Eds.), The norms of nature: Studies in Hellenistic ethics (pp. 145–183). CUP.
Engel, D. M. (2000). The gender egalitarianism of Musonius Rufus. Ancient Philosophy, 20, 377–391. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil200020235
Erskine, A. (1990). The Hellenistic Stoa. Political thought and action. BCP.
Favez, C. (1933). Un féministe romain: Musonius Rufus. Bulletin de la Société des Études de Lettre de Lausanne, 8, 1–8.
Folch, M. (2015). The city and the stage. Performance, genre and gender in Plato’s Laws. OUP.
Foxhall, L. (2013). Studying gender in classical Antiquity. CUP.
Gardner, J. F. (1986). Women in Roman law and society. IUP.
Giannantoni, G. (Ed.). (1983–1985). Socraticorum reliquiae (4 Vols.). Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
Gill, C. (1988). Personhood and personality: The four-personae theory in Cicero, De officiis I. In J. Annas (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 6 (pp. 169–199). Clarendon Press.
Glucker, J. (1995). Probabile, veri simile and related terms. In J. G. F. Powell (Ed.), Cicero the philosopher (pp. 115–143). Clarendon Press.
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (2003). Les Kynika du Stoïcisme. Steiner.
Gourinat, J.-B. (2014). Comment se détermine le kathekon? Remarques sur la conformité à la nature et le raisonnable. Philosophie antique, 14, 13–39. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.737
Guérard, C. (1989). Antipatros de Tarse. In R. Goulet (Ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques (Vol. 1, pp. 219–223). Éditions du CNRS.
Hawley, R. (1994). The problem of women philosophers in ancient Greece. In L. J. Archer, S. Fischler & M. Wyke (Eds.), Women in ancient societies (pp. 70–87). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hill, L. (2001). The first wave of feminism: Were the Stoics feminists?. History of Political Thought, 22(1), 13–40.
Hirzel, R. (1877–1883). Untersuchungen zu Cicero’s philosophischen Schriften. 3 Bde. S. Hirzel.
Houser, J. S. (1997). The philosophy of Musonius Rufus: A study of applied ethics in the late Stoa [PhD dissertation, Brown University, Providence].
Husson, S. (2011). La République de Diogène. Une cité en quête de la nature. Vrin.
Inwood, B. (1986). Goal and target in Stoicism. Journal of Philosophy, 83(10), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026429
Isnardi Parente, M. (1989). Ierocle Stoico: oikeiosis e doveri sociali. In W. Haase (Ed.), Band 36/3. Teilband Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik. Philosophie (Stoizismus) (pp. 2201–2226).
Johnson, B. E. (2014). The role ethics of Epictetus. Stoicism in ordinary life. Lexington.
Kapparis, K. A. (2018). Athenian law and Society. Routledge.
Keener, C. (2007). Women’s education and public speech in Antiquity. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 50(4), 747–759.
Kidd, I. G. (1955). The relation of Stoic intermediates to the ‘summum bonum’ with reference to change in the Stoa. The Classical Quartertly, 5(3-4), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800011435
Klein, J. S. (2015). Making sense of Stoic indifferent. In B. Inwood (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 49 (pp. 227–281). OUP
Laurand, V. (2014). Stoïcisme et lien social. Enquête autour de Musonius Rufus. Garnier.
Long, A. A., & Sedley, D. N. (Eds.). (1987). The Hellenistic philosophers (2 Vols.). CUP.
Loraux, N. (1990). Les Enfants d’Athéna. Idées athéniennes sur la citoyenneté et la division des sexes. Seuil.
Mauch, M. (1997). Senecas Frauenbild in den philosophischen Schriften. Lang.
Meijer, P. A. (2017). A new perspective on Antisthenes. Logos, predicate and ethics in his philosophy. AUP.
Müller, R. (1984). Zur Staatsauffassung der frühen Stoa. In J. Harmatta (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the International Federation of the Societies of Classical Studies (pp. 293–301). Akadémiai Kiadó.
Murnaghan, S. (1988). How a woman can be more like a man: the dialogue between Ischomachus and his wife in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus. Helios, 15(1), 9–22.
Navia, L. E. (1996). Classical Cynicism. A critical study. Greenwood.
Nebel, G. (1935). Der Begriff des καθῆκον in der alten Stoa. Hermes, 70, 439–460.
Nolan, D. (2006). Stoic gunk. Phronesis, 51(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852806777006796
Nussbaum, M. (2002). The incomplete feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic and Roman. In M. Nussbaum & J. Sihvola (Eds.), The sleep of reason: erotic experience and sexual ethics in ancient Greece and Rome (pp. 282–326). UCP.
Pentassuglio, F. (2017). Eschine di Sfetto: alcune nuove testimonianze. Méthexis, 29, 59–88.
Philippson, R. (1933). Hierokles der stoiker. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 72, 97–114.
Pohlenz, M. (1967). La Stoa. Storia di un movimento spirituale, 2 Vols. (E. Alfieri, Trans.). La Nuova Italia. (Original work published 1949)
Pomeroy, S. B. (1975). Goddesses, whores, wives and slaves. Women in classical Antiquity. Schocken.
Prächter, K. (1901). Hierocles der stoiker. Dieterich.
Ramelli, I. L. E. (2016). Extraits du traité Sur le mariage: Stobée. In J.-B. Gourinat (Ed.), L’éthique du stoïcien Hiéroclès (pp. 157–167). Presses universitaires du Septentrion
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005). The Roman Stoics. Self, Responsibility and affection. UCP.
Rieth, O. (1934). Über das Telos der Stoiker. Hermes, 69, 13–45.
Sambursky, S. (1959). Physics of the Stoics. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Scharrer, U. (2002). Frauen und Geschlechterrollen in der Sicht der hellenistischen Stoa. In C. Ulf & R. Rollinger (Eds.), Geschlecther, Frauen, fremde Ethnien in antiker Ethnographie. Theorie und Realität (pp. 119–172). Studien.
Schofield, M. (1991). The Stoic idea of the city. UCP.
Sedley, D. N. (1999). The Stoic-Platonist debate on kathêkonta. In K. Ierodiakonou (Ed.), Topics in Stoic philosophy (pp. 128–152). Clarendon Press.
Smith, N. D. (1983). Plato and Aristotle on the nature of women. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 21(4), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1983.0090
Snyder, J. (1989). The woman and the lyre: Women writers in Classical Greece and Rome. SIUP.
Solmsen, F. (1964). Leisure and play in Aristotle’s ideal State. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 107, 193–220.
Stalley, R. (1983). An introduction to Plato’s Laws. Hackett.
Strauss, L. (1998). Xenophon’s Socratic discourse. An interpretation of the Oeconomicus. St. Augustine.
Susemihl, F. (1900). Die Aspasia des Antisthenes. Philologus, 59, 148–151.
Swain, S. (2013). Economy, family and society from Rome to Islam. A critical edition, English translation and study of Bryson’ Management of the Estate. CUP.
Tafuri, M. (2014). Etica e politica nell’opera di Eschine di Sfetto. Una lettura socratica dell’Atene di V secolo [PhD dissertation, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Napoli]. Federico II Open Archive. http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/10028
Torre, C. (2000). Il matrimonio del sapiens. Ricerche sul De matrimonio di Seneca. Darficlet.
Tuomela, L. (2014). Virtues of man, woman or human being? An intellectual historical study on the views of the later Stoics Seneca the Younger, Musonius Rufus, Epictetus, Hierocles and Marcus Aurelius on the sameness of the virtues of man and woman [PhD dissertation, Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsinki]. Digital Repository of the University of Helsinki. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/135732
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1994). Zeno’s Republic and the origin of natural law. In P. A. Vander Waerdt (Ed.), The Socratic movement (pp. 272–308). CUP.
Wider, K. (1986). Women philosophers in the ancient Greek world. Hypathia. A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 1(1), 21–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1986.tb00521.x
Wiersma, W. (1937). Τέλος und καθῆκον in der alten Stoa. Mnemosyne, 5, 219–228.
Wöhrle, G. (2002). Wenn Frauen Platons Staat lesen, oder: Epiktet und Musonius konstruieren Geschlechterrollen. Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, 26, 135–143.
Yates, V. L. (2015). Biology is destiny: The deficiencies of women in Aristotle’s biology and politics. Arethusa, 48(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2015.0004
