The Moral Status of Institutional Negligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.8.1.6345Keywords:
Institutional Negligence , Institutional Responsibility, Individual vs. Institutional Responsibility, Institutional Character, Legal vs. Moral Culpability JusticeAbstract
The moral status of negligent actions presents a unique quandary because these actions are prima facie unintentional, but preventable with due care. Legally culpable negligent acts occur without malicious intent but result in harm, and the agent owed care to the victim, but failed to act with the appropriate care due. In this essay, I argue that the moral status of negligent actions varies depending on whether the agent is an individual, or an organization or institution. I contend that while negligence is often only minimally morally blameworthy for individual agents, it is significantly more blameworthy for an organization or institution. As agents, institutions are different in kind from individuals, partly due to their superior capacities, which give them the ability to shape their own character, and therefore the moral fault of their vices that lead to culpably negligent actions are morally weightier than those of individuals.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anandita Mukherji

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
