Environmentalism as a Political Philosophy for the Anthropocene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/anthropocenica.3089Resumo
A filosofia política nasce dos reflexos das crises, riscos e ameaças que a sociedade enfrenta. O autor entende o ambientalismo como uma tendência da filosofia política atual que parte de refletir as causas e possíveis efeitos da crise ambiental global como uma das mais graves ameaças às pré-condições existenciais do sistema político atual e da civilização global. Considerando as mudanças nas condições sociais, tecnológicas e ambientais iniciais de existência do sistema político-económico – que são consequências da transição da era geológico-climática estável do Holoceno para a era instável do Antropoceno – é necessário reconsiderar as premissas básicas dos imperativos e marcos conceituais do atual sistema político-económico. Os fundadores do pensamento político moderno traçaram os contornos do atual sistema político-económico no quadro filosófico, embora possamos identificar algumas das premissas básicas do ambientalismo e conceitos relevantes para a reflexão das ameaças e riscos atuais em algumas de suas obras. O autor considera o conceito de direitos civis e humanos, o conceito de estado de natureza e o conceito de contrato social adequados para pensar a crise do atual sistema político-económico em termos de ambientalismo. Em seguida, o autor formula em que sentido esses conceitos também são válidos para o Antropoceno. Em conclusão, a hipótese do autor é que a filosofia política do século XXI deve refletir as pré-condições ambientais e os limites da existência e das formas do sistema político-económico e, ao mesmo tempo, deve levar em conta que qualquer econômicos e fatores influenciam a qualidade e sustentabilidade do meio ambiente.
Downloads
Referências
Angus, I. (2016). Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil capitalism and the crisis of earth system. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Beck, U. (2010). Remapping social inequalities in an age of climate change: for a cosmopolitan renewal of sociology. Global Networks 10(2): pp. 165-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00281.x
Beck, U. ([2012] 2013). German Europe. Transl.: R. Livingstone. Cambridge: Polity.
Bivona, R. (2016, September 27). It's Time to Replace the Estate Tax With a Progressive Inheritance Tax. Retrieved from: http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/37761-it-s-time-to-replace-the-estate-tax-with-a-progressive-inheritance-tax
Davies, J. (2016). The birth of the Anthropocene. Oakland, California: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520964334
Dubnička, I. (2007a). Kultúra a environmentálna kríza [Culture and the environmental crisis]. Nitra: UKF v Nitre.
Dubnička, I. (2007b). Mravy, šelmy a vegetariáni [Morals, beasts and vegetarians]. Nitra: UKF v Nitre.
Hayek, F. (1973 [2013]). Law, Legislation and Liberty a New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. London & New York: Routledge.
Hohoš, L. (2016). A Tentative Scenario of “Sustainable Degrowth Society”. Philosophica Critica, 2(1): pp. 59-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17846/PC.2019.2.1.59-64
Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition. Political Theory, 20(2): pp. 187-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020002001
Honneth, A. (1994). Universalismus als moralische Falle?: Bedingungen und Grenzen einer Politik der Menschenrechte [Universalismus als moralische Falle?: Bedingungen und Grenzen einer Politik der Menschenrechte]. Merkur, 48(546/547): pp. 867-883.
Jaspers, K. (1957). Die Atombombe und die Zukunft des Menschen [The atomic bomb and the future of humanity]. München/Zürich.
Jonas, H. (1979). Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation [The principle of responsibility. An ethics for technological civilization]. Frankfurt/Main: Insel‐Verlag.
Kučírek, J. (1998). Politika a ideológia environmentalizmu [Politics and ideology of environmentalism]. Civitas – časopis pre politické a sociálne vedy, 4(14): pp. 2-4.
Kučírek, J. (2008). Ekofilozofia včera, dnes a zajtra [Ecophilosophy yesterday, today and tomorrow]. Nitra: UKF v Nitre.
Monstesquieu, C. (1748). Esprit des lois. Genève: Barrillot & Fils.
Næss, A. & Rothenberg, D. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525599
Novosád, F. (2013). O čom sú dejiny sociálnych a politických teórií [What is the history of social and political theories about]. In: F. Novosád & D. Smreková (eds.), Dejiny sociálneho a politického myslenia [History of Social and Political Thought] (pp. 11-19). Bratislava: Kalligram.
OXFAM (2016, January 18). 62 people own the same as half the world, reveals Oxfam Davos report. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2016-01-18/62-people-own-same-half-world-reveals-oxfam-davos-report
OXFAM (2017, January 16). Just 8 men own same wealth as half the world. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2017-01-16/just-8-men-own-same-wealth-half-world
OXFAM (2019). Public good or private wealth? Oxford: Oxfam.
Patočka, J. (1996). Nadcivilizacie a její vnitřní konflikt [Over-civilization and its internal conflict]. In: J. Patočka, Péče o duši I. Sebrané spisy. Svazek 1 [Care for the soul I: Collected works. Volume 1]. (pp. 243–302). Praha: Oikoymenh.
Rousseau, J.-J. ([1762] 2011). On the Social Contract. In: Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Basic Political Writings (pp. 155-252). Transl.: D. Cress. Hackett Publishing Company.
Šmajs, J. (2011). Potřebujeme filosofii přežití? Úvahy o přírodě, kultuře, ekonomice, práci, poznání a popularizaci vědy [Do we need a philosophy of survival? Reflections on nature, culture, economics, work, knowledge and popularization of sciences]. Brno: Doplněk – Masarikova Univerzita.
Šmajs, J. (2013). Proč etika nestačí [Why ethics is not enough]. Filosofický časopis, 61(6): pp. 803-826.
Šmajs, J. (2015). Příroda – nový subjekt morálky a práva? [Nature - a new subject of morality and law?]. Filosofický časopis, 63(5): pp. 749-756.
Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. In Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938): pp. 842-867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
Steffen, W., Persson, A., Deutsch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., Crumley, C., Crutzen, P., Folke, C., Gordon, L., Molina, M., Ramanathan, V., Rockström, J., Scheffer, M., Schellnhuber, H. J., & Svedin, U. (2011). The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio, 40(7), 739–761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science (New York, N.Y.), 347(6223), 1259855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Sťahel, R. (2015). Environmentálna zodpovednosť a environmentálna bezpečnosť [Environmental responsibility and environmental safety]. Filozofia, 70(1): pp. 1-12.
Sťahel, R. (2016a). Environmental Crisis and Political Revolutions. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474415347.003.0006
In: J. Arnasson & M. Hrubec (Eds.), Social Transformations and Revolutions: Reflections and Analyses (pp. 99-120). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sťahel, R. (2016b). K rozporu v zdôvodnení charakteru a pôvodu ľudských práv [Inconsistency in the justification of the nature and origin of human rights].
In: A. Javorská, L. Kocinová & S. Wagnerová (eds.), (Meta)filozofia – prax: zborník vedeckých príspevkov [(Meta) philosophy - practice: a collection of scientific papers] (pp. 273-279). Bratislava: SAV..
Sťahel, R. (2016c). Filozofia environmentálnej krízy globálnej priemyselnej civilizácie [Philosophy of the environmental crisis of global industrial civilization]. In: O. Suša, O. & R. Sťahel, Environmentální devastace a sociální destrukce [Environmental devastation and social destruction]. (pp. 97-225). Praha: Filosofia.
Sťahel, R. (2016b). Climate Change and Social Conflicts. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 15(5): pp. 480-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341403
UN (2015). Framework Convention on Climate Change (Adoption of the Paris Agreement). Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
