Uma defesa da investigação em arte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.473Palavras-chave:
Investigação em arte, Requisitos para investigação em arte, Potencialização, ExemplificaçãoResumo
Neste artigo defende-se, em primeiro lugar, que há um sentido em que a investigação em arte não é apenas possível, mas desejável. Em segundo lugar, há um conjunto mínimo de componentes escritos/materiais que são as condições mínimas para que algo seja considerado investigação para a arte (no sentido de Frayling). Terceiro, que o valor epistêmico dos resultados é derivado do conceito de exemplificação como origem do valor epistémico no universo denso de possibilidades artísticas. E, finalmente, essa investigação artística é uma ferramenta para capacitar o artista, se isso for feito dentro de um conjunto de parâmetros que lhe dão algum valor epistêmico.
Referências
Beardsley, M. (2012). An aesthetic definition of Art. In P. Lamarque & S. H. Olsen(Eds.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art.Oxford: Blackwell.
Benjamin, W. (1996). The task of the translator. In M. J. M.Bullock(Eds.), Walter Benjamin – Selected Writings, Vol.I, 1913–1926.London: Harvard University Press.
Biggs, M. A. (2002). The rhetoric of research. Common Ground, Proceedings of the Design Research Society International Conference at Brunel University(pp. 111–118). Stoke-on Trent, UK: Staffordshire University Press.
Bologna(1999). The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999.Education, Joint declaration of the European Ministers.
Bunge, M. (1983). Treatise on basic philosophy 5: Epistemology & methodology I –exploring the world.Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Carroll, N. (2004). Art and the Moral Realm. In P. Kivy(Ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics(pp. 126–151). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756645.ch7
Dickie, G. (2012). The new institutional theory of Art. In P. Lamarque & S. H. Olsen(Eds.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art.Oxford: Blackwell.
Durrant, A. C., Vines, J., Wallace, J. & Yee, J. S. (2017). Research through Design: Twenty-First century makers and materialities. DesignIssues,33(3), pp. 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00447
Elgin, C. (1991). Understanding: Art and Science. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16.196–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1991.tb00239.x
Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method(3rded.). London: Verso.
Frayling, C. (1993). Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers,1(1), 1–5.
Freeland, C. (1997). Art and moral knowledge. Philosophical Topics 25, 11–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19972518
Friedman, K. (2008). Research into, by and for Design. Journal of Visual Arts Practice, 153–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.7.2.153_1
Gibson, J. (2003). Between thruth and triviality.British Journal of Aesthetics, 43(3), 224–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.3.224
Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols.Hobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
Gould, G. (1994). Forgery and imitation in the creative process. Grand Street,50,53–62.doi:10.2307/25007782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25007782
Green, M. (2010). How and what we can learn from fiction. In G. L. Hagberg & WalterJost(Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature(pp. 350-366). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315592.ch18
Irvin, S. (2005). The artist’s sanction in contemporary Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,63(4), 315–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00214.x
John, E. (2005). Art and knowledge. In B. Gaut & D. M. Lopes(Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics(pp. 329–340). London: Routledge.
Jones, T. (1978). A discussion paper on research in the visual fine Arts prepared for the Birmingham Polytechnic. Leonardo,13(2), 89-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1577976
Karmel, P. (1999). Jackson Pollock: Interviews, articles, and reviews. New York: The Museum of Modern Art: Distributed by H.N. Abrams.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of Scientific revolutions(2ndenlarged ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lamarque, P. (2010). Literature and truth. In G. L. Hagberg & W. Jost(Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature(pp. 367–384). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315592.ch19
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern.(C. Porter, Trad.)Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lesage, D. (2009). Who’s afraid of artistic research? On measuring artistic research output. ART&RESEARCH: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, 2(2).
McAllister, J. (2004). Seven claims. In A. W. Balkema & H. Slager(Eds.), Artistic Research.Lier en Boog, Series of Philosophy of Art and Art Theory, vol. 18.Amsterdam/New York: Editions Rodopi B.V.
OED. (n.d.). Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 12 2017, from Oxford University Press:<https://en.oxforddictionaries.com>.
Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of Science: A very short introduction.New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802835.001.0001
Pitz, H. (2004). Seven remarks. In A. W. Balkema & H. Slager(Eds.), Artistic Research.Lier en Boog, Series of Philosophy of Art and Art Theory, vol. 18.Amsterdam/New York: Editions Rodopi B.V.
Pollock, J. (1947). My painting. Possibilities (Winter 1947-48). Wittenborn, Schultz, Inc.
Popper, K. (2002). The logic of Scientific discovery.Routledge Classics.
Read, H. (1944). Education through Art.London: Faber and Faber.
Simuforosa, M. & Wiseman, M.(2016). A guide to conducting research: A student handbook paperback. Strategic Book Publishing & Rights Agency.
Slager, H. (2004). Methododicy. In A. W. Balkema & H. Slager(Eds.), Artistic Research. Lier en Boog. Series of Philosophy of Art and Art Theory, vol. 18.Amsterdam/New York: Editions Rodopi B.V.
Slager, H. (2015). The pleasure of research. Hatje Cantz Verlag.
Snow, C. P. (1998). The two cultures.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stolnitz, J. (1992). On the cognitive triviality of Art. In P. Lamarque & S. H. Olsen(Eds.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art;The analytic tradition: An anthology(pp. 337–343). Oxford: Blackwell.
Uidhir, C. M. & Magnus, P. (2011). Art concept pluralism. Metaphilosophy, 42(1-2),83–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01678.x
Verwoert, J. (2006). School’s out!-? In V. Abu Eldahab & Waldvogel, F.(Eds),Notes for an art school(p. 60). Nicosia: Dexter Sinister.
Vidmar, I. (2015). Literature and Philosophy: Intersection and boundaries. Arts 4(1),1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/arts4010001
Vidmar, I. (2010). Against the cognitive triviality of Art. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, vol. 2., 516-531.
Vries, G. de(2004). Beware of research. In A. W. Balkema & H. Slager(Eds.), Artistic Research. Lier en Boog,Series of Philosophy of Art and Art Theory, vol. 18.Amsterdam/New York: Editions Rodopi B.V.
Weitz, M. (2012). The role of theory in aesthetics. In P. Lamarque& S. H. Olsen(Eds.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art (pp. 12-18). Oxford: Blackwell.[first publ. 1956]
Zimmerman, J. & Forlizzi, J. (2014). Research through Design in HCI. In J. Olson & W. Kellogg(Eds.), Ways of Knowing in HCI(pp. 167–189). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_8
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through Design as a method for interaction Design research in HCI. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems(pp. 493–502). ACM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Pedro Alegria
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
