The Two Faces of Political Parties: How They Can Both Promote and Hinder Rawls’ Public Reason
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.6.2.4897Keywords:
John Rawls, Legitimacy, Political Parties, Public ReasonAbstract
This article explores the impact of political parties on a Rawlsian model of public reason. Political parties possess the potential to play a vital role in promoting public reason by connecting the background culture and the public political forum, identifying and systematizing the diverse array of opinions within a pluralist society. They can translate comprehensive doctrines into shared public values, advance electoral programs that articulate a reasonable political conception of justice and construct the deliberative arena necessary for public reason. However, it is crucial to recognize that political parties can also undermine public reason. They may prioritize sectarian interests over shared ones, appeal to non-liberal or perfectionist values, perpetuate misinformation, succumb to the influence of monetary donations, or adopt a closed-minded and rigid ideological stance. Achieving the ideal of public reason necessitates political parties striking a delicate balance between advancing their own agendas and respecting a practice of public justification.
References
Bonotti, M. (2017). Partisanship and Political Liberalism in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198739500.001.0001
___ (2014). Partisanship and public reason. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(3), 314–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2014.886381
Cohen, J. (1991). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Pettit, P., & Hamlin, A. (Eds.), The Good Polity (pp. 17-34). Blackwell Pub.
Langvatn, S.A. (2016). Legitimate, but unjust; just, but illegitimate. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 42(2), 132–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715615386
Freeman, S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy. A Sympathetic Comment, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29(4), 371–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00371.x
Lawson, K. (1988). When linkage fails. In Lawson, K. & Merkl, P. H. (Eds.), When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations. (pp. 13–38). Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400859498.13
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659935
Muirhead, R. (2006). A Defense of Party Spirit. Perspectives on Politics, 4(04). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060452
___ (2010). Can deliberative democracy be partisan?, Critical Review, 22(2-3), 129–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2010.508631
Muirhead, R., & Rosenblum, N. L. (2006). Political Liberalism vs. “The Great Game of Politics”: The Politics of Political Liberalism. Perspectives on Politics, 4(01). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060105
___ (2012). The Partisan Connection. California Law Review Circuit (3), 99-112.
___ (2020). The Political Theory of Parties and Partisanship: Catching Up. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 95–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-020727
Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
––– (1999). A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
––– (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
___(1997). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3): 765-807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1600311
Rosenblum, N. L. (2008). On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: Volume 1: A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
Suran M. (2023). Government Accountability Office Examines Political Interference Among US Health Agencies, JAMA 329 (4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.23556
White, J., & Ypi, L. (2016). The Meaning of Partisanship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684175.001.0001
___ (2010). Rethinking the Modern Prince: Partisanship and the Democratic Ethos. Political Studies, 58(4), 809–828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00837.x
___ (2011). On Partisan Political Justification, American Political Science Review, 105(2), 381–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000074
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Joana Pinto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
