COMPENSATION AS MORAL REPAIR AND AS MORAL JUSTIFICATION FOR RISKS

Authors

  • Madeleine Hayenhjelm Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Umeå University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.81

Keywords:

compensation, apologies, reparations, restitution, moral repair

Abstract

Can compensation repair the moral harm of a previous wrongful act? On the one hand, some define the very function of compensation as one of restoring the moral balance. On the other hand, the dominant view on compensation is that it is insufficient to fully repair moral harm unless accompanied by an act of punishment or apology. In this paper, I seek to investigate the maximal potential of compensation. Central to my argument is a distinction between apologetic compensation and non-apologetic compensation. Apologetic compensation, I argue, is an act that expresses regret and apology by means of some offer of money, goods, or services. Non-apologetic compensation is an act that seeks to restore loss or harm without expressing regret or apology. In the paper, I defend the view that acts of compensation can be apologetic and argue that such apologetic compensation is sufficient for moral repair.

References

S.P. (2001). Punishment and the Restoration of Rights. Punishment & Society, 3(4), 485-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228384

Chapman, B. (1995). Wrongdoing, welfare, and damages: recovery for nonpecuniary loss in corrective justice. In D. Owen (Ed.), Philosophical foundations of tort law (pp. 409-425). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265795.003.0019

Cohen, G.A. (2012). Rescuing Conservatism: A Defense of Existing Value. In Finding Oneself in the Other (pp. 143-174). Princeton: Princeton University DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400845323-010

Press.

Corlett, J.A. (2002). Wrongdoing, Reparations and Native Americans. In R. C. Roberts (Ed.) Injustice and Rectification (pp. 147-164). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0421-2_9

Duff, R.A. (2001). Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Feinberg, J. (1970a). Justice and Personal Desert. In Doing and Deserving (pp. 55-87). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Feinberg, J. (1970b). The Expressive Function of Punishment. In Doing and Deserving (pp. 95-118). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ferretti, M.P. (2016). Risk impositions and freedom. Politics, Philosophy, and Economics, 15 (3):261-279. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1470594x15605437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X15605437

Gaus, G.F. (1991). Does compensation restore equality? In J.W. Chapman (Ed.) NOMOS XXXIII: Compensatory Justice (pp. 45-81). New York: New York University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814790144.003.0007

Gill, K. (2000). The moral functions of an apology. The Philosophical Forum 31(1): 11–27. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0031- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0031-806X.00025

X.00025/full

Goodin, R. (1991). Theories of compensation. In R. Frey & C. Morris (Eds.), Liability and Responsibility: Essays in Law and Morals (pp. 257–289). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527395.009

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Govier, T. & Verwoerd, W. (2002). The promise and pitfalls of apology. Journal of Social Philosophy 33(1): 67–82. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9833.00124/full DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9833.00124

Griseri, P. (1985). Punishment and Reparation. The Philosophical Quarterly, 35 (141), 394-413. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2219474?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2219474

Hampton, J. (2007). Righting wrongs: The goal of retributivism. In D. Farnham (Ed.), The Intrinsic Worth of Persons: Contractarianism in Moral DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618239

and Political Philosophy (pp. 108–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hayenhjelm, M. (2012). What is a fair distribution of risk? In S. Roeser, M Peterson, R Hillerbrand & P. Sandin (Eds.) Handbook of Risk Theory (pp. 909-929). Dordrecht: Springer Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_36

Hayenhjelm, M & Wolff, J. (2012) The Moral Problem of Risk Impositions: A Survey of the Literature. European Journal of Philosophy, 20(S1): E26-E51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00482.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00482.x

Hegel, G. (1973). Hegel's Philosophy of Right (T.M. Knox, translator). New York: Oxford University Press.

Holm, S. (2016). A Right Against Risk Imposition and the Problem of Paralysis. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19 (4): 917-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9697-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9697-6

Kumar, R. (2015). Risking and Wronging. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 43 (1): 27-51. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papa.12042/full DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12042

Lazar, S. R. (2008). Corrective justice and the possibility of rectification. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(4), 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9108-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9108-8

Marshall, S. (2001). Noncompensatable wrongs, or having to say you’re sorry. In M.H. Kramer (Ed.), Rights, Wrongs and Responsibilities (pp. 209– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523630_7

. New York: Palgrave.

McCarthy, D. (1997). Rights, explanation, and risks. Ethics, 107(2): 205–225. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/233718?journalCode=et DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/233718

Nozick, R. (2006 [1974]). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Belnap Press, Harvard University Press.

Oberdiek, J. (2008). Towards a Right Against Risking. Law and Philosophy, 28(4): 367-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-008-9039-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-008-9039-5

Radzik, L. (2004). Making amends. American Philosophical Quarterly 41(2): 141–154. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20010149?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Railton, P. (1985). Lock, stock, and peril: Natural property rights, pollution, and risk. In M. Gibson (Ed.), To Breathe Freely: Risk, Consent and

Air (pp. 89–123). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.

Ripstein, A. (2006). Beyond the harm principle. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 34 (3), 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00066.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00066.x

Roberts, R.C. (2002). Justice and Rectification: A Taxonomy of Justice. In R. C. Roberts (Ed.), Injustice and Rectification (pp. 7-28). New York: Peter

Lang.

Ronay, B. (2008, May 9). Young, rich and drunk. The Guardian. Retrieved from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/may/09/oxbridgeandelitism.highereducation.

Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564

Smith, N. (2008). I Was Wrong: The Meanings of Apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steigleder, K. (2016). Climate risks, climate economics, and the foundations of rights-based risk ethics. Journal of Human Rights 15 (2): 251-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2015.1083849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2015.1083849

Teuber, A. (1990). Justifying risk. Daedalus 119(4): 235–254. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20025348.

Zimmerman, M.J. (1994). Rights, Compensation, and Culpability. Law and Philosophy 13(4): 419-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350478

Downloads

Published

29-09-2023

How to Cite

Hayenhjelm, M. . (2023). COMPENSATION AS MORAL REPAIR AND AS MORAL JUSTIFICATION FOR RISKS. Ethics, Politics & Society, 2, 33–63. https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.81