ENACTING LEVINAS’S INFINITE RESPONSIBILITY AS AN ETHICO-POLITICAL COMPROMISE

Authors

  • Julio A. Andrade Department of Philosophy, University of Stellenbosch

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.96

Keywords:

Levinas, ethics, politics, infinite responsibility, business ethics, CSR

Abstract

Levinas’s work does not offer us an ethical theory but seeks rather to describe a pre-originary ethical encounter with the other. Within this face-to-face encounter with the other, my subjectivity is held hostage because of an originary asymmetry between us. This ethical asymmetry produces an infinite responsibility to and for the other, in order that the singularity of the other be preserved. In order to moderate such a demanding position Levinas introduces the third party who restores justice by permitting ethical calculation. This marks a move from ethics to politics. Nonetheless, there remains a lacuna between ethics and politics. I argue for a reading of Levinas’s claim that the third party is an incessant correction of the asymmetry of proximity in order to posit infinite responsibility as the compromise of ethics with politics. I discuss some implications for business ethics, in particular CSR, in light of these findings.

References

Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, E., Michael C. Jensen, M.C., Ronald K. Mitchell, R.K., & J. Wood, D.J. (2008) ‘Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory.’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214

Alford, C.F. (2001). Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power. London: Cornell University Press.

Alford, C.F. (2004). ‘Levinas and Political Theory’ Political Theory 32(2),146-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703254977

Critchley, S. (1999). The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Critchley, S. (2004). ‘Five Problems in Levinas’s View of Politics and the Sketch of a Solution to Them’ Political theory 32(2), 172-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703261771

Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

Friedman, M. (1970) ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’ in T. Donaldson & P.H. Werhane (eds.) Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach 8th edition (2008) London: Prentice Hall, 34-39.

Frynas, J. G. and Stephens, S. (2015). ‘Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas’ International DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12049

Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 483–509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2011.17.11.509

Jones, C., Parker, M., & Ten Bos, R. (2005). For Business Ethics. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203458457

Jordaan, E. (2009). ‘Cosmopolitanism, freedom, and indifference: A Levinasian view.’ Alternatives, 34, pp.83-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540903400105

Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (1985) Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Translated by R.A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press

Levinas, E. (1989) The Levinas Reader. Ed S. Hand. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Levinas, E. (1998). Otherwise Than Being, or Beyond Essence. Translated by A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (2001). Is it Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas. Ed J.Robbins. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

McMurray, R., Pullen,A. & Rhodes, C. (2010). ‘Ethical subjectivity and politics in organizations: A case of health care tendering’. Organization, 18(4), pp.541-561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410388336

Parker, M. (2003). ‘Ethics, Politics and Organizing’. Organization, 10(2), pp.187-203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508403010002001

Perpich, D. (2008). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779784

Raffoul, F. (1998). ‘On Hospitality, between Ethics and Politics: review of Adieu a Emmanuel Levinas by Jacques Derrida’ Research in Phenomenology, 28, p. 274-283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156916498X00164

Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G. & Dirk Matten, D. (2009) ‘Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalization as a Challenge for Business Responsibilities’ Business Ethics Quarterly,19(3), 327-347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200919320

Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12203

Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Woermann, M. (2016). Bridging Complexity and Post-Structuralism: Insights and Implications. Switzerland: Springer International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39047-5

Wolff, E. (2011). Political responsibility for a Globalised World. After Levinas’ Humanism. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_627785

Downloads

Published

29-09-2023

How to Cite

Andrade, J. A. . (2023). ENACTING LEVINAS’S INFINITE RESPONSIBILITY AS AN ETHICO-POLITICAL COMPROMISE. Ethics, Politics & Society, 2, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.96