FROM INNATE MORALITY TOWARDS A NEW POLITICAL ETHOS: SIMONE WEIL WITH CAROL GILLIGAN AND JUDITH BUTLER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.195Keywords:
rights, obligations, needs, aggression, care, concernAbstract
In 1943, Simone Weil proposed to supersede the declaration of human rights with a declaration of obligations towards every human being's balancing pairs of body and soul's needs, for engaging and inspiring more effectively against autocratic and populist currents in times of crisis. We claim that Weil's proposal, which remains pertinent today, may have been sidestepped because her notion of needs lacked a fundamental dimension of relationality, prominent in the 'philosophical anthropology' underlying the (different) visions for a new political ethos of both Judith Butler and Carol Gilligan. From the radical starting point of innate morality common to all three thinkers, we therefore indicate how an enriched notion of interlaced needs, encompassing both balance and relationality, may restore the viability of a declaration of human obligations as a robust source of inspiration. In this combination of balance and relationality, Butler's notion of aggressive nonviolence is key.
References
Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823225033.001.0001
Butler, J. (2020). The force of nonviolence. Verso.
Gabellieri, E. (2015, November 23). Enracinement, religion et mystique chez S. Weil [Paper presentation]. Académie des sciences morales et politiques, Paris. https://academiesciencesmoralesetpolitiques.fr/2015/11/23/enracinement-religion-et-mystique-chez-s-weil/
Gessen, M. (2020, February 6). Judith Butler wants us to reshape our rage. The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/judith-butler-wants-us-to-reshape-our-rage
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1988). Exit-voice dilemmas in adolescent development. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, J. M. Taylor & B. Bardige (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education (pp. 141–158). Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C. (2011). Joining the resistance. John Wiley & Sons.
Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630–646. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2025030
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0
von der Ruhr, M. (2006). Simone Weil, an apprenticeship in attention. Continuum.
Weil, S. (1988). Le beau et le bien. In G. Kahn & R. Kuhn (Eds.), Simone Weil, Oeuvres completes I: Premiers écrits philosophiques (pp. 60–73). Gallimard. (Original work published 1926)
Weil, S. (1976). The notebooks of Simone Weil, vol. 1. Routledge. (Original work published 1941)
Weil, S. (2015). Essay on the concept of reading. In E. Springsted (Ed.), Simone Weil, late philosophical writings (E. Springsted & L. E. Schmidt, Trans.) (pp. 21–27). University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1941)
Weil, S. (1965). Plan for an organization of front-line nurses. In Seventy letters (R. Rees, Trans.) (pp. 145–153). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1942)
Weil, S. (1986a). Human personality. In S. Miles (Ed.), Simone Weil: An anthology (pp. 49–78). Grove Press. (Original work published 1943)
Weil, S. (1986b). Draft for a statement of human obligations. In S. Miles (Ed.), Simone Weil: an anthology (pp. 201–210). Grove Press. (Original work published 1943)
Weil, S. (2002). The need for roots: Prelude to a declaration of duties towards mankind. (A. Wills, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1943) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203193518
Weil, S. (2014). L'Enracinement ou Prélude a une déclaration des devoirs envers l'être humain (F. de Lussy & M. Narcy, Eds.). Flammarion. (Original work published 1943)
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). Morals and education. In Winnicott, D.W. (Ed.), The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development, (pp. 93–105). Hogarth. (Original work published 1962) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429482410-8
Winnicott, D. W. (1989). Comments on my paper “The use of an object”. In D. W. Winnicott (Ed.), Psychoanalytic explorations (pp. 238–240). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1968)
