Democratic equality and Rawls’s criticism of welfare state capitalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.5.2.213Keywords:
Capitalist welfare state, capitalism, democratic equality, justice as fairnessAbstract
Despite the accusation of developing an abstract theory, detached from real conditions, depoliticizing, and ultimately inclined towards the status quo, Rawls did not fail to analyze, since 1971, the political-economic conditions in which his theory could become viable. The analysis of this topic concludes with the statement that the principles and ideals of his theory could not be satisfied under capitalism in any of its forms. This article discusses the possibilities of making justice as fairness compatible under a capitalist welfare state and shows that the reasons Rawls presented for denying this possibility remain perfectly valid. The difficulties of a capitalist welfare state to curb the tendencies of capitalism towards undemocratic inequality make this system unacceptable. The article defends that, although it is a noble ideal to prevent anyone from falling below a certain social minimum, the requirements of the principles of justice are much more demanding. The article concludes by defending Rawls's methodology and main arguments and shows that far from having depoliticizing effects, justice as fairness allows us to broaden the political imagination both to denounce the highly oligopolistic character of capitalist economies and to combat the ubiquitous inclination of neoliberalism towards economic efficiency as an all-encompassing value.
References
Anderson, E. (2013). The imperative of integration. Princeton University Press.
Blanco Brotons, F. (2021). El paradigma de justicia democrática. Una concepción estructural de las injusticias globales. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Cast, A., & Burke, P. (2002). A theory of self-esteem. Social Forces, 80, 1041–1068. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0003
Forrester, K. (2021). In the shadow of justice: Postwar liberalism and the remaking of political philosophy. Princeton University Press.
Freeman, S. (2007). Rawls. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086605
Freeman, S. (2013). Property-owning democracy and the difference principle. Analyse and Kritik, 35, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2013-0103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2013-0103
Freeman, S. (2020, September 6). Review of the book In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy by K. Forrester. Notre Dame Philosophical Review, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/in-theshadow-of-justice-postwar-liberalism-and-the-remaking-of-political-philosophy/#_edn12
Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245
Gilens, M. (2005). Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi058
Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason. Remarks on John Rawls's political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(3), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil199592335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil199592335
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Mills, C. W. (2014). The racial contract. Cornell University Press.
Miranda-Ruche, X. (2018). Consideraciones estructurales para la intervención en salud mental: pobreza, desigualdad y cohesión social. Trabajo Social Global – Global Social Work, 8(14), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v8i14.6377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v8i14.6377
Murphy, L., & Nagel, T. (2002). The myth of ownership: Taxes and justice. Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195150163.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195150163.001.0001
Navarro, V. (2015). Bienestar insuficiente, democracia incompleta. Anagrama.
O’Neill, M. (2019). Power, predistribution, and social justice. Philosophy, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819119000482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819119000482
Pettit, P. (2002). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford University Press.
Ravecca, P., & Dauphinee, E. (2022). What is left for critique? On the perils of innocence in neoliberal times. Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10/gpfrh5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/ltdl.77064
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice (1st edition). Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Belknap Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness. A restatement. Belknap Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0
Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism (Expanded ed.) Columbia University Press.
Sandel, M. (1984). The procedural republic and the unencumbered self. Political Theory, 12(1), 81–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591784012001005
Scanlon, T. M. (2020). ¿Por qué importa la desigualdad?. Avarigani.
Shklar, J. N. (1990). The faces of injustice. Yale University Press.
Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x
Vallier, K. (2015). A moral and economic critique of the new property-owning democrats: On behalf of a Rawlsian welfare state. Philosophical Studies, 172(2), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0303-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0303-2
Walzer, M. (1981). Philosophy and democracy. Political Theory, 9(3), 379–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009059178100900307
Weale, A. (2013). The property-owning democracy versus the welfare state. Analyse and Kritik, 35, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2013-0104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2013-0104
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level. Why equality is better for everyone. Allen Lane.
