Fundamentos de um Rendimento Básico Incondicional Ecológico

Autores

  • Souza Souza Universidade do Minho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.7.1.4941

Palavras-chave:

Rendimento Básico Incondicional, Ecologia, Ambientalismo, Justiça Socioeconómica, Republicanismo Verde, Pós-produtivismo

Resumo

O presente artigo debate os pontos fundamentais de um RBI Ecológico. Primeiramente, propõe-se uma revisão da literatura em Ética Ecológica/Ambiental. O Republicanismo Verde também estabelece uma base teórica ao RBI ecológico. Além disso, agendas de pós-produtivismo e decrescimento são indispensáveis para a humanidade lidar com as atuais urgências ecológicas, como demonstrado na teoria do RBI aqui analisada. Com base nesse debate e na revisão da literatura, o artigo propõe pontos fundamentais para um RBI Ecológico: (i) financiamento originado da tributação da extração de recursos (não apenas da extração de combustíveis) e da concentração de renda/riqueza; (ii) coordenação de diferentes políticas públicas para desmercantilizar necessidades fundamentais; (iii) suficiência do Rendimento Básico para que o indivíduo tenha as suas necessidades básicas satisfeitas independentemente de trabalho; (iv) estímulo de economias regionais e circulares. Ecologismo não inviabiliza medidas ambientais de curto prazo, que são essenciais quando se trata de transições verdes e justas.

Referências

Almiron, N.; & Tafalla, M. (2019). Rethinking the ethical challenge in the climate deadlock: anthropocentrism, ideological denial, and animal liberation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 32, n. 2, p. 255-267.

Almiron, N., & Aranceta-Reboredo, O. (2022). Lobbying against compassion: A review of the ethics of persuasion when nonhuman animal suffering is involved. methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales, 10(2): 410-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v10i2.575

Alves C. (2022). Aspectos ecológicos de uma Renda Básica: O caso de Maricá. Tese de Mestrado. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Econômicas. UFF: Rio de Janeiro.

Audier, S. (2015). Les théories de la république. Paris: La Découverte.

Block, F. L. (1990) Postindustrial possibilities: A critique of economic discourse. University of California Press.

Bookchin, M. (1990). The Philosophy of Social Ecology: Essays on Dialectical Naturalism. Montréal: Black Rose Books

Boyce, J. K., & Barnes, P. (2016). How To Pay For Universal Income. Retrieved from http://evonomics.com/how-to-pay-for-universal-basic-income/

Cannavò, P., (2016). Environmental Political Theory and Republicanism. In: T. Gabrielson, et al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 72-88.

Casal, P. (2012) Progressive environmental taxation: A defence. Political Studies, v. 60, n. 2, p. 419-433.

Casassas, D., & De Wispelaere, J. (2016). Republicanism and the political economy of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(2), 283-300. doi:10.1177/1368431015600026

Dektar, M. (2020). Informações sobre políticas socioeconômicas de Maricá e sua avaliação/Information on Maricá's socioeconomic policies and their evaluation.

Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Burke, M. (2019). Global warming has increased global economic inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.,

Donovan, J. & Adams. C. (2007). The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics. Columbia University Press.

Donovan, J. (2007). Attention to Suffering: Sympathy as a Basis for Ethical Treatment of Animals. In J. Donovan and C. J. Adams (Eds.), The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics (pp. 174–197). Columbia University Press.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Fremaux, A. (2018). Towards a Critical Theory of the Anthropocene and a Life-affirming Politics. (PhD). Queen’s University, Belfast, UK. < https://www.academia.edu/36936310/PhD_Thesis_Towards_a_Critical_Theory_of_the_Anthropocene_and_a_Life_affirming_Politics_A_Post_Anthropocentric_Post_Growth_Post_neo_Liberal_Green_Republican_Analysis >

Gama, J. V. (2022). Rendimento Básico Incondicional em Portugal: Como Podemos Pagá-lo? (to be published).

Goldsmith, S. (2012). The economic and social impacts of the Permanent Fund Dividend on Alaska. In K. Widerquist & M. W. Howard (Eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its suitability as a model (pp. 49–63). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gorz, A. (1980). Ecology as Politics. Montréal: Black Rose Press.

Gorz, A. (1997). Sortir de la société salariale. In Misères du présent. Richesse du possible. Galilée, Paris

Gruen, L. (2014). Entangled Empathy. Lantern Books

Horta, O. (2016). Egalitarianism and animals. Between the species, 19(1), 109–145.

Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity Without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow. Oxford: Routledge.

Merrill, R., Bizarro, S., Marcelo, G., Pinto, J. (2019). Rendimento Básico Incondicional: Uma defesa da liberdade. O Saber da Filosofia.

Merrill, R., Neves, C., Laín, B., (2021). Basic income experiments: A critical examination of their goals, contexts, and methods. Springer Nature.

Neves, C. & Merrill, R. (2023). O valor de um rendimento básico incondicional: custos e benefícios. Um estudo para Portugal. RBI Um caminho de liberdade.

Nussbaum, M.C. (1996). Compassion: the basic social emotion. Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation, 13(1): 27-58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500001515

Offe, C. (1992). A non-productivist design for social policies. In P. Van Parijs (Ed.), Arguing for Basic Income (pp. 61-80). London and New York: Verso Books

Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford University Press.

Pettit, P. (2012). On the people's terms: a republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Pinto, J. (2020) Green Republicanism: non-domination for an ecologically sustainable planet. (Ph.D.). Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal. < https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/76484>

Puleo, A.H. (2021). Ecofeminismo para otro mundo posible. Plaza y Valdés.

Purdy, D. & Van Trier, W (1988). Political feasibility of the transition to a basic income society. Basic income and problems of implementation: Proceedings of these international conference on basic income, p. 45-64.

Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Rollin, B. D. (2016). A new basis for animal ethics: Telos and common sense. Columbia, MO: The University of Missouri Press.

Singer, P. (1975/1990). Animal liberation. New York, NY: HarperCollins

Singer, T. & Klimecki, O.M. (2014). Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, 24(18): R875-R878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054

Souza, T. (2021). The Bolsa Família Case: a road to the unconditional basic income. Master Thesis. Portugal, Lisbon. < https://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/130845>

Souza, T. (2022), Maricá Citizen’s Basic Income an overview of the pilot. Proceedings of the 2021 FRIBIS Annual Conference published: Financial Issues of a Universal Basic Income (UBI), 155-169.

Torry, M. (2019). The Palgrave international handbook of basic income. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Van Parijs, P. (2004). Basic income: a simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century. Politics & Society, 32(1), 7-39.

Van Parijs, P. (2009). Political Ecology: From Autonomous Sphere to Basic Income. Basic Income Studies 4, article 6.

Van Parijs, P. (2013). A green case for Basic Income? Basic Income: An anthology of contemporary research, p. 269-274.

Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic Income: A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Velasco, A. (2016). Ética del cuidado para la superación del androcentrismo: hacia una ética y una política ecofeministas. Revista CTS, 31(11), 195–216.

Velasco, A. (2017). La ética animal ¿Una cuestión feminista? Plaza y Valdés.

Widerquist, K., Noguera, J., Vandeborght, Y., & Wispelaere, J. (2013). Basic income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research. Chichester: Wiley.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-09-06

Como Citar

Souza, T. (2024). Fundamentos de um Rendimento Básico Incondicional Ecológico. Ética, Política & Sociedade, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.7.1.4941

Edição

Secção

The costs and benefits of a UBI