The geoheritage and the geoutouristic potential in Distrito Federal, Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/physisterrae.2254Keywords:
Geodiversity, Geoconservation, Scientific educational potential, Landscape dynamics, Landscape value variationAbstract
This study sought to approach geoheritage, geoconservation and geotourism, presenting a diagnosis of potential points of interest for geoheritage. In the beginning of the study, two scenarios were mapped: the first one was based on geotourism spots — mainly the main waterfalls and caves in the Federal District (DF) of Brazil — and, on the second one, quarries were used as scientific resource, primarily for the understanding of the geological and geomorphological genesis of potential heritage sites in the Federal District. Therefore, this research aimed to indicate places where genetic processes of the landscape can be noticed in a peculiar way, which encompasses geodiversity and geoheritage. Thus, this work offers a new geographic look about geotouristic, educational and scientific potential in the region, providing the preservation and conservation of the environment. This approach, centered in the described aspects, resulted in a map with more than two hundred points of interest to the geomorphological heritage in DF. From that, it was possible to propose a new methodology, in which the space-time dynamics is fundamental: the variation of values typically atributted to geoheritage in a 12 month period.
Downloads
References
Brilha, J. (2014). Mining and Geoconservation. Encyclopedia of Mineral and Energy Policy, 9(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40871-7_9-1
Brilha, J. (2015). Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage, 8(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3
Brocx, M., Semeniuk, V. (2007). Geoheritage and geoconservation – History, definition, scope and scale. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 90(2), 53-87. Disponível em: https://www.rswa.org.au/publications/Journal/90(2)/volume90part253-87l.pdf
Campos, J. E. G. (2004). Hidrogeologia do Distrito Federal: bases para a gestão dos recursos hídricos subterrâneos. Revista Brasileira de Geociências, 34(1), 41-48. Disponível em: http://www.ppegeo.igc.usp.br/index.php/rbg/article/view/9485
Carvalho, L. C. da C. (2014). Inventariação do patrimônio geomorfológico do litoral de Portugal Continental: meios de transição. 80 p. Dissertação de Mestrado em Patrimônio Geológico e Geoconservação. Universidade do Minho. 2014.
Coratza, P., Giusti, C. (2005). Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 307-313. Disponível em: http://www.aiqua.it/index.php/the-journal/il-quaternario-1988-2011/volume-18-1/329-methodological-proposal-for-the-assessment-of-the-scientific-quality-of-geomorphosites/
Dowling, R. K. (2011). Geotourism’s Global Growth. Geoheritage, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7
Erikstad, L. (2012). Geoheritage and geodiversity management – the questions for tomorrow. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 124(4), 713-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.07.003
Erikstad, L., Lindblom, I., Jerpâsen, G., Hanssen, M. A., Bekkby, T., Stabbetorp, O., Bakkestuen, V. (2008). Environmental value assessment in a multidisciplinary EIA setting. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(2-3), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.005
Garcia-Cortés, A., Úrqui, L. C. (2009). Proposta para la atualización metodológica del inventário español de lugares de interés geológico (IELIG). Espanha: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España.
Gray, M. (2004). Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..
Gray, M. (2008). Geoheritage 1. Geodiversity: A New Paradigm for Valuing and Conserving Geoheritage. Geoscience Canada, 35(2), 51-59. Disponível em: https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/GC/article/view/11084
Hose, T. A. (2000). European ‘geotourism’ – geological interpretation and geoconservation promotion for tourists. In: D. Barettino; W.A. P. Wimbledon; E. Gallego (org) Geological Heritage: Its Conservation and Management. (pp. 127-146). Madrid: IGME.
Hudson, B. J. (1998). Waterfalls Resources for Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(4), 958-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00043-7
International Congress of Geotourism. (2011). The Arouca Declaration. Disponível em: http://www.europeangeoparks.org/?p=223
Joko C. T., Santos, R. M. M., Campos, J. E. G. (2002). Caracterização preliminar do aquífero de São Sebastião. In: Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Águas Subterrâneas, 7 (p. 1-11). Florianópolis.
Kirchner, K., Kubalíková, L. (2015). Geomythology: an useful tool for geoconservation and geotourism purposes. In: J. Fialová; D. Pernicová (eds) Public recreation and landscape protection — with man hand in hand!, 2008 Conference proceeding (pp. 68-74). Brno.
Lima, F. F. (2008). Proposta metodológica para inventariação do patrimônio geológico brasileiro. Tese de Mestrado em Patrimônio Geológico e Geoconservação. Universidade do Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.
Lima, F. F., Brilha, J., Salamuni, E. (2010). Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage, 2(3-4), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0014-9
López-García, J. A.; Oyarzun, R.; Andrés, S. L.; Martínez, J. I. M. (2011). Scientific, Educational, and Environmental Considerations Regarding Mine Sites and Geoheritage: A Perspective from SE Spain. Geoheritage, 3(4), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0040-2
Martins, E. S., Reatto, A., Carvalho Jr., O. A., Guimarães, R. F. (2004a). Evolução Geomorfológica do Distrito Federal. Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados.
Martins, E. S., Reatto, A., Carvalho Jr., O. A., Guimarães, R. F. (2004b). Unidades de paisagem do Distrito Federal, escala 1:100.000. Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados.
Muñoz-Saba Y., Andrade, G. I., Baptiste, L. G., Salas, D., Villareal, H., Armenteras, D. (1998). Conservación de los Ecosistemas Subterráneos en Colombia. Biosíntesis, 10, 1-4. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11761/32627
Newsome, D., Dowling, R. K. (2010). Geotourism: the tourism of geology and landscape. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers.
Panizza, M. (2001). Geomorphosites: Concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46(1), 4-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187227
Pereira, L. S., Nogueira, H. M. (2015). Avaliação quantitativa do valor geoturístico do geopatrimônio, caso do litoral sul paraibano, Brasil. Cadernos de Geografia, 34, 53-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/0871-1623_34_6
Pereira, P. (2006). Património geomorfológico: conceptualização, avaliação e divulgação. Aplicação ao Parque Natural de Montesinho. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Piacente, S. (2005). Geosites and geodiversity for a cultural approach to Geology. Il Quaternario Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 11-14. Disponível em: http://www.aiqua.it/index.php/volume-18-1/300-geosites-and-geodiversity-for-a-cultural-approach-to-geology
Pralong, J. P. (2005). A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 11(3), 186-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.350
ProGEO (2011). Conserving our shared heritage - a protocol on geoconservation principles, sustainable site use, management, fieldwork, fossil and mineral collecting. Disponível em: http://www.progeo.ngo/downloads/progeo_protocol_definitions.pdf
ProGEO (2017). Geodiversity, Geoheritage & Geoconservation: the ProGEO simple guide. Disponível em: http://www.progeo.ngo/downloads/ProGEO_leaflet_EN_2017.pdf
Prosser, C. D., Bridgland, D. R., Brown, E. J., Larwood, J. G. (2011). Geoconservation for science and society: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 122(3), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2011.01.007
Reynard, E. (2009). Geomorphosites: Definitions and characteristics. Geomorphosites. In: Reynard, E., Coratza, P., Regolini-Bissig, G. (org) Geomorphosites. (pp. 9-20). München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.
Reynard, E., Coratza, P. (2013). Scientific research on geomorphosites: a review of the activities of the IAG working group on Geomorphosites over the last twelve years. Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria, 36(1), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2013.36.13
Reynard, E., Coratza, P., Hobléa, F. (2016). Current Research on Geomorphosites. Geoheritage, 8(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0174-3
Regolini-Bissig, G. (2010). Mapping geoheritage for interpretive purpose: definition and interdisciplinary approach. In: Mapping Geoheritage (pp. 1-13). Institut de géographie, Géovisions, Lausanne, 35.
Ríos-Reyes C. A., Manco-Jaraba, D. C., Castellanos-Alarcón, O. M. (2018). Geotourism in caves of Santander as a novel strategy for the protection of natural and cultural heritage associated to underground ecosystems. Biodiversity International Journal, 2(5), 464-474. https://doi.org/10.15406/bij.2018.02.00101
Rodrigues, M. L., Fonseca, A. (2008). A valorização do geopatrimónio no desenvolvimento sustentável de áreas rurais. In: Anais do Colóquio Ibérico de Estudos Rurais: Cultura, Inovação e Território, 7 (pp. 1-14). Coimbra.
Rodrigues, M. L., Machado, C. R., Freire, E. (2011). Geotourism routes in urban áreas: a preliminar approach to the Lisbon geoheritage survey. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 8(2), 281-294. Disponível em: http://gtg.webhost.uoradea.ro/PDF/GTG-2-2011/12_100_Rodrigues.pdf
Serrano, E., González-Trueba, J. J. (2005). Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie. Relief, processus, environnement, 11(3), https://doi.org/197–208. 10.4000/geomorphologie.364
Sharples, C. (2002). Concepts and principles of geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service.
Sousa, L. D. C. (2014). Inventariação do patrimônio geomorfológico do litoral de Portugal Continental: costas altas. Dissertação de Mestrado em Patrimônio Geológico e Geoconservação, Universidade do Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.
Steinke, V. A. (2003). Uso integrado de dados digitais morfométricos (altimetria e sistema de drenagem) na definição de unidades geomorfológicas no Distrito Federal. Dissertação de Mestrado em Geologia, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
Steinke, V. A., Sano, E. E. (2011). Semi-Automatic Identification, GIS-Based Morphometry of Geomorphic Features of Federal District of Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Geomorfologia, 12(1), 03-09. http://dx.doi.org/10.20502/rbg.v12i1.213
Steinke, V. A., Sano, E. E., Steinke, E. T., Nascimento, R. O. (2007). O Desenvolvimento dos estudos geomorfológicos no Distrito Federal. Geografia (Rio Claro), 32(1), 107-120. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/9182
Stueve, A. M., Cook, S. D., Drew, D. (2002). The Geotourism Study: Phase I Executive Summary. Washington: Travel Industry Association of America.
Vieira, A. (2014). O patrimônio geomorfológico no contexto da valorização da geodiversidade: sua evolução recente, conceitos e aplicação. Revista Cosmos, 7(1), 28-59. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/34835
Wimbledon W. A. P., Andresen, S., Cleal, C. J., Coie, J., Erikstad, L., Gonggrijp, G. P., Johasson C. E. (1999). Geological World Heritage: geosites, a global comparative site inventory to enable priorisation for conservation. Memorie Descritive della Carta Geologica d’Italia, LIV, 45-60.
