No princípio era a Natureza: percursos da Ecocrítica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/anthropocenica.3100Abstract
Ecocriticism is a new paradigm in Literary Studies. This essay has as main purposes: 1) To reconstruct the path of Ecocriticism, since its institutionalization in the 1990s until today; 2) To highlight the relevance of literary studies on the environment; 3) To dentify the multidisciplinary nature of Ecocriticism and its current and future trends.
Downloads
References
Alaimo, S. (2008). Trans-corporeal Feminisms and the Ethical Space of Nature. In: Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman (eds.) (2008). Material Feminisms (pp. 237-2649. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Brulle, R. (2000). Agency, Democracy, and Nature. The US Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1158.001.0001
Buell, L. (2005). The Emergence of Environmental Criticism. In: Lawrence Buell (2005). The Future of Environmental Criticism (pp. 1-28). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Coupe, L. (ed.). (2000). The Green Studies Reader. From Romanticism to Ecocriticism. London and New York: Routledge.
Flys Junquera, C. et al. (eds.) (2010). Ecocríticas. Literatura y Medio Ambiente. Madrid y Frankfurt: Iberoamericana / Vervuert. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31819/9783964566317
Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203644843
Glotfelty, C. and Fromm, H. (eds.) (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader. Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press.
Heise, U. (1997). Science and Ecocriticism. The American Book Review. 18, 5, 1-4.
Hilbert, B. S. (2001). Beyond ‘Thou Shalt Not’: An Ecocritic Reads Deuteronomy. In: Karla Armbruster and Kathleen Wallace (eds.) (2001). Beyond Nature Writing. Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism (29-40). Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.
Iovino, S. (2010). Ecocriticism and a Non-Anthropocentric Humanism. Reflections on Local Natures and Global Responsibilities. In: Laurenz Volkmann (ed.) (2010). Local Natures. Global Responsabilities. Ecocritical Perspectives on the New English Literatures (pp. 29-54). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042028135_004
Iovino, S. and Oppermann, S. (2012). Material Ecocriticism. Materiality, Agency, and Models of Narrativity. Ecozon@. Vol. 3, Number 1, 75-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2012.3.1.452
Love, G. A. (2003). Practical Ecocriticism. Literature, Biology, and the Environment. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.
Oppermann, S. (2019). Teorizando a Ecocrítica. Para uma Prática Ecocrítica Pós-Moderna. Tradução de José Eduardo Reis. Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto: Instituto de Literatura Comparada Margarida Losa e Edições Afrontamento.
Slovic, S. (2016). The Fourth Wave of Ecocriticism: Materiality, Sustainability, and Applicability”. INC
Slovic, S. & Yang, Y. (2010). Future of Ecocriticism: Strategic-openness and Sustainability: – An interview with Scott Slovic. Comparative Literature: East & West. 13:1, 105-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2010.12015571
Westling, L. (2006). Literature, the environment, and the question of the posthuman. In: Catrin Gersdorf and Sylvia Mayer (eds.). (2006). Nature in Literary and Culture Studies. Transatlantic Conversations on Ecocriticism (25-48). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
Worster, D. (1993). The Wealth of Nature. Environmental History and the Ecological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092646.001.0001
