Anthropocene, Technocene and the Problem of Philosophy of Education

Autores

  • Eva Dědečková Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences
  • Simon J. Charlesworth Associated Scholar, Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Soziologie und Soziologische Theorie Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Kapuzinergasse 2 85072 Eichstätt Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/anthropocenica.4000

Palavras-chave:

Anthropocene – technology – philosophy of education – world – Fink – Nietzsche

Resumo

O termo Antropoceno começou a aparecer com mais frequência no discurso científico há mais de 20 anos. Foi uma tentativa de aproximar-se da compreensão da profundidade e gravidade do impacto do homem e suas atividades no planeta Terra, com a intenção de, no futuro, mitigar esses efeitos e evitar um possível colapso ambiental global catastrófico, que poderia envolver o colapso da própria civilização. No entanto, até ao momento, a nossa abordagem do mundo praticamente não mudou. Depois da pandemia veio a ameaça de um conflito mundial, uma guerra nuclear. Como o nosso saber científico parece impotente, mesmo o conhecimento científico mais óbvio e assustador não pode de alguma forma mudar o curso da sociedade global. Queremos pensar essa situação a partir da perspectiva da filosofia cosmológica da educação. O seu motivo central é a revelação filosófica do fundamento ontológico original de nossa humanidade, que é o mundo, o cosmos. É um confronto direto com a “educação de mercado” até agora prevalecente, que serve para manter e consolidar os esquemas de poder da política do capital.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografias Autor

Eva Dědečková, Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Graduate of Charles University in Prague (Ph.D. in Philosophy, 2019), currently employed as a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences. Her research is focused primarily on the cosmological philosophy of Eugen Fink and Friedrich Nietzsche, with emphasis on the philosophy of education. She is an author of Slovak monograph Kozmologická filozofia výchovy Eugena Finka (The Cosmological Philosophy of Education by Eugen Fink) published in 2018.

Simon J. Charlesworth, Associated Scholar, Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Soziologie und Soziologische Theorie Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Kapuzinergasse 2 85072 Eichstätt Germany

Simon J. Charlesworth did an MPhil in Social and Political Theory and then a PhD at Cambridge University.  He grew up amidst the ruins of a traditional industrial region in South Yorkshire, his education paralleled a life of unemployment, and has worked as an independent writer based in Rotherham, United Kingdom. His work cuts across the boundaries between Sociology and Philosophy and is strongly inspired by, among others, Hegel, Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Searle and Bourdieu. His analyses are ethnographically grounded in working class experiences, primarily in Northern England, but also provide powerful autobiographical testimonies to the institutional anchoring of the systematic devaluation of working class people in the institutions of contemporary society, especially in academia. He is the author of several articles and one monograph, A Phenomenology of Working Class Experience, published by Cambridge University Press in 2000.

Referências

Bourdieu, P. (1979). Algeria 1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Love of Art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P, and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1994). Academic Discourse. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1999). The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bowles, S. and Choi, J-K. (2019). The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution and the Origins of Private Property. Journal of Political Economy, 127(5): pp. 2186-2228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/701789

Crutzen, P. and Stoermer, E. (2000). The ‘Anthropocene’. IGBP Newsletter, 41: pp. 17-18.

Dědečková, E. (2018). Kozmologická filozofia výchovy Eugena Finka [The Cosmological Philosophy of Education by Eugen Fink]. Praha: PedF UK.

Fink, E. (1974). Traktat über die Gewalt des Menschen. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

Fink, E. (1979). Nietzsches Philosophie, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Fink, E. (1987). Existenz und Coexistenz. Grundprobleme der menschlichen Gemeinschaft. Franz-A. Schwarz (Eds.). Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.

Fink, E. (1992). Natur, Freiheit, Welt. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.

Fink, E. (2003). Nietzsche’s Philosophy. Translated by G. Richter. London/New York: Continuum.

Fink, E. (2010). Spiel als Weltsymbol. In: Cathrin Nielsen and Hans Rainer Sepp (Eds.), Gesamtausgabe, vol. 7, Freiburg: Alber, 2010.

Fink, E. (2016). Play as Symbol of the World and Other Writings. Translated by Ian A. Moore and Christopher Turner. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Gehlen, A. (2016). Urmensch und Spätkultur: Philosophische Ergebnisse und Aussagen. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783465142720

Charlesworth, S. (1999). A Phenomenology of Working Class Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489419

Charlesworth, S. (2019). The Truth is Out There: ‘Educated fo’ Bollocks. Uni’s Just Institutional Daylight Robbery’. Universities in Crisis? What’s New? In: Leonidas Donskis, Ida Sabelis, Frans Kamsteeg and Harry Wels (Eds.), Academia in crisis, pp. 169-194. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004402034_010

Kaplan, M. (2021, December 22). After death threats, Dr. Alina Chan doubles down onn COVID-19 origin theory. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2021/12/22/dr-alina-chan-doubles-down-on-covid-19-origin-theory/.

Lumila, M. (2020). Technische Bildung als eine weltoffene und für die Bildungstheorie angemessene Konzeption bei Eugen Fink. In: Naděžda Pelcová and Lea Květoňová (Eds.), Existence a koexistence ve filosofické, speciálněpedagogické a psychologické reflexi. Inkulzivní škola [Existence and coexistence in philosophical, specialpedagogical and psychological reflection. Inculsive school], pp. 101-118. Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Education. Available also online: https://www.academia.edu/43326545/_Technische_Bildung_als_eine_weltoffene_und_f%C3%BCr_die_Bildungstheorie_angemessene_Konzeption_bei_Eugen_Fink.

Mendes, J. (2021). Does the Sustainability of the Anthropocene Technosphere Imply an Existential Risk for Our Species? Thinking with Peter Haff. Social Sciences, 10(8): pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.3390/socsci10080314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10080314

Nietzsche, F. (1988a). Unzeitgemässe Betrachtungen. In: G. Colli and M. Montinari (Eds.), Kritische Studienausgabe 1. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1988b). Also sprach Zarathustra. In: G. Colli and M. Montinari (Eds.), Kritische Studienausgabe 4. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112418802

Nietzsche, F. (1988c). Nachgelassene Fragmente 1875-1879. In: G. Colli and M. Montinari (Eds.), Kritische Studienausgabe 8. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110860986

Nietzsche, F. (1988d). Nachgelassene Fragmente 1885-1887. In: G. Colli and M. Montinari (Eds.), Kritische Studienausgabe 12. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112419045

Downloads

Publicado

2022-10-19

Como Citar

Dědečková, E., & Charlesworth, S. J. (2022). Anthropocene, Technocene and the Problem of Philosophy of Education. Anthropocenica. Revista De Estudos Do Antropoceno E Ecocrítica, 3. https://doi.org/10.21814/anthropocenica.4000

Edição

Secção

Artigos