MIGRATIONS, POLITICAL BORDERS AND THE DIGITAL REALM. FORMS OF (IN)VISIBILITY AND DISRUPTIVE STRATEGIES IN LITERARY AND ARTISTIC ACTIVISM

Authors

  • Paulo Silva Pereira Universidade de Coimbra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.5168

Keywords:

migration, marginalization, activism, artistic practices, digital poetry

Abstract

Many studies have addressed the issue of migration and displacement, one of the main geopolitical challenges of our time, but far fewer have analysed it using an interdisciplinary framework and selecting literary and artistic practices from a transnational context. !e purpose of this paper is to describe the way in which the artists use the specificity of medium and mechanism in their projects to reflect on the current migratory crisis and forced migration, to critique the securitization or the politics of immigration in recent years and to explore a tactical use of tech-nologies in order to expand public consciousness and political debate. It is directly focused on the migratory processes involving Mexicans who go to the United States and its connection to the complex political imaginary of these regions, and on the relationship between identity and marginalization, particularly the influence of the conceptualization of migrants as the Other in contemporary European society. Based on the analysis of a series of case studies both from a theoretical and from an artistic point of view –, this research intends to understand how these projects explore forms of critical intervention, dissent or disruption of a dominant semiotic regime by stimulating critical thinking about consolidated narratives and sign systems of identity and difference.

References

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Anzaldúa, G. (1999). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. 2nd edition. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.

Balibar, E. (2009). Europe as Borderland. Environment and Planning D Society and Space, 27, 2, April, 190-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d13008

Balibar, E. (2003). We, the people of Europe? Reflections on transnational citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bird, L. (2011). Global Positioning: An Interview with Ricardo Dominguez. Furtherfield (15/10/2011). Retrieved Sept. 18, 2017, from http://www.furtherfield.org/features/global-positioning-interview-ricardo-dominguez

Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London and New York: Verso.

Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational Aesthetics. Paris: Les Presses du réel.

Cárdenas, M., Carroll, A., Dominguez, R. (2015). Operation Faust y Furioso: A Trans [ ] Border Play on the Redistribution of the Sensible, Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 19, 4, 16-30.

Cárdenas, M., Carroll, A., Dominguez, R., Mehrmand, E., Stalbaum, B. (2009). The Transborder Immigrant Tool: Violence, Solidarity and Hope in Post-NAFTA Circuits of Bodies Electr(on)/ic, Mobile HCI (September 15-18, 2009, Bonn, Germany). Retrieved Sept. 18, 2017, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.561.1854&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Cárdenas, M., Carroll, A., Dominguez, R., Mehrmand, E. & Stalbaum, B. [Electronic Disturbance Theater 2.0/b.a.n.g. lab] (2010). Sustenance. A Play for All Trans [ ] Borders. New York: Printed Matter, Inc. (Artists & Activists series). Retrieved Sept. 18, 2017, from http://www.thing.net/~rdom/Sustenance.pdf

Cárdenas, M., Carroll, A., Dominguez, R., Mehrmand, E. & Stalbaum, B. [Electronic Disturbance Theater 2.0/b.a.n.g. lab] (2014). The Transborder Immigrant Tool / La herramienta transfronteriza para inmigrantes. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The Office of Net Assessment, The University of Michigan. Retrieved Sept. 18, 2017, from http://collection.eliterature.org/3/files/transborder-immigrant-tool/transborder-immigrant-tool.pdf

Demos, T.J. (2013). The Migrant Image: The Art and Politics of Documentary during Global Crisis. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395751

Dominguez, R. [Electronic Disturbance Theater 2.0/b.a.n.g. lab] (2017), Border Research and the Transborder Immigrant Tool. Media Fields Journal, 12, 1-5

Fischer-Lichte, E. & Wihstutz, B., Eds. (2017). Transformative Aesthetics. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315164991

Fisher, R. M. (2006). Invoking 'Fear' Studies. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 22 (4), 39-71.

Finkelpearl, T. (2013). What We Made: Conversations on Art and Social Cooperation. Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395515

Garcia, D. & Lovink, G. (2008). The ABC of Tactical Media. Retrieved Sept. 18, 2017, from http://www.tacticalmediafiles.net/articles/3160

Goldstein, Evan R. (2010), Digitally Incorrect: Ricardo Dominguez's provocations: art or crimes?. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3 Oct. 2010. Retrieved Sept. 18, 2017, from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Digitally-Incorrect/124649

Hemment, D. (2006), Locative Arts. Leonardo, 39, 4, 348-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.4.348

Jen, A. (2017). Boundary Issues. Oscar-winning film director Alejandro Iñarritu embraces virtual reality. ArtDesk Magazine, 17, 7. Retrieved Jan. 18, 2018, from https://readartdesk.com/img/issue-17.pdf

LpJHU, M. J. (2014). Aesthetic Responsibility. A Conversation with Krzysztof Wodiczko on the Transformative Avant-Garde. Third Text, 28, 2, 123-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2014.885628

Miner, D. (2014). Creating Anew: Chicano Art, Indigenous Sovereignty, and Lowriding Across Turtle Island. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Raley, R. (2009). Tactical Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rancière, J. (1999). Dis-agreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001

Rancière, J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Rancière, J. (2001). Ten Theses on Politics. Theory & Event, 5.3, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2001.0028

Rodney, L. (2016). Looking Beyond Borderlines: North America's Frontier Imagination. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731698

Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369818

Sassen, S. (2016). Free emergent migrations: an epochal change. Sur. International Journal on Human Rights, 23, v. 13 n. 23, 29-41.

Seiça, A. (2017). Who emigrates departs with #words in their pockets @ aimisola.net/hymiwo.po. Cibertextualidades, 8, 43-56.

Sützl, W. & Hug, T., Eds. (2012). Activist Media and Biopolitics: Critical Media Interventions in the Age of Biopower. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_503694

Thoreau, H. D. (1849). Resistance to Civil Government. Retrieved Sept. 18, 2017 from <http://commons.digitalthoreau.org/civil/>

Ulmer, G. L. & Freeman, J. C. (2014). Beyond the Virtual Public Square: Ubiquitous Computing and the New Politics of Well-Being. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented Reality Art: From an Emerging Technology to a Novel Creative Medium (pp. 61-79). Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06203-7_3

Wodiczko, K. (2000). Open Transmission. In Alan Reed (Ed.), Architecturally Speaking: Practices of Art, Architecture and the Everyday (pp. 87-95). London and New York: Routledge.

Wodiczko, K. (1999). Critical Vehicles: Writings, Projects, Interviews. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Retrieved Sept. 18, 2017, from https://issuu.com/hcalibrary5/docs/wodiczko_krzysztof_critical_vehicle

Žižek, S. (2017). Against the Double Blackmail: Refugees, Terror and Other Troubles with the Neighbors. London: Penguin.

Published

2019-05-28

How to Cite

Pereira, P. S. (2019). MIGRATIONS, POLITICAL BORDERS AND THE DIGITAL REALM. FORMS OF (IN)VISIBILITY AND DISRUPTIVE STRATEGIES IN LITERARY AND ARTISTIC ACTIVISM. Diacrítica, 31(3), 57–90. https://doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.5168