‘Thinking Ontologically’: Ontology Development as the Basis for the Systematic Analysis of a Corpus of Late Antique Aramaic Magic Texts

Authors

  • Hatty Walker University of Exeter

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/h2d.3403

Keywords:

Ontology, Jewish Babylonian Aramaic magic bowls, CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, CRM, Typologies, Domain

Abstract

This article describes the process of developing an ontology of the domain of Jewish Babylonian Aramaic magic bowls and offers some reflections on its significance in the analysis of these materials. Examples are highlighted to illustrate where the work builds on existing conceptualisations of the domain in secondary literature and where magical and religious materials from the Ancient Near East might stimulate some specialised extension of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group, 2020). The analogy of ‘bridge building’ is offered as a way for humanities researchers to conceive of the work to produce ontologies of specific domains. This reflection is intended to capture the experience of ‘thinking ontologically’ about sources for the first time and of overcoming misconceptions about the nature and significance of this work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhayro, S., Ford, J. N., Levene, D., & Saar, O.-P. (2018). Aramaic magic bowls in the Vorderasiatisches Museum in Berlin. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373686

Brickley, D., & Miller, L., (2014). FOAF vocabulary specification 0.99. http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/

Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R., & Benjamins, V. R. (1999). What are Ontologies, and why do we Need Them? IEEE Intelligent Systems and their applications, 14(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.747902

Ford, J. N., & Morgernstern, M. (2020). Aramaic incantation bowls in museum collections – Volume. 1: The Frau Professor Hilprecht collection of Babylonian antiquities, Jena. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004411838

ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group, (2020). Definition of the CIDOC conceptual reference model version 7.0.1. ICOM/CRM Special Interest Group. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Version/version-7.0.1

Levene, D. (2002). Curse or blessing: What's in the magic bowl? The Parkes Institute. https://humanities.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/collegeofhumanities/theology/ourresearch/documents/Levene_Curse_or_Blessing.pdf

Pitti, D. V. (2004). Designing sustainable projects and publications. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities (pp. 469-487). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999875.ch31

Ramsay, S. (2004). Databases. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities (pp.

-197). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999875.ch15

Shaked, S., Ford, J. N., & Bhayro, S. (2013). Aramaic bowl spells: Jewish Babylonian Aramaic bowls (Vol. 1). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004229372

Sperberg-McQueen, C. M. (2004). Classification and its structures. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities (pp. 161-176). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999875.ch14

Published

2021-10-31

How to Cite

Walker, H. (2021). ‘Thinking Ontologically’: Ontology Development as the Basis for the Systematic Analysis of a Corpus of Late Antique Aramaic Magic Texts . H2D|Digital Humanities Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21814/h2d.3403