Printed matter, nomad matter: On the ideological possibilities of artist’s publications

Authors

  • Márcia Oliveira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.4985

Keywords:

Artists' publications, Movement, Ideology, Dictatorship

Abstract

In a dictatorial or repressive context, movement can be said to be one of the most fundamental and disruptive forms of (aesthetic) resistance. Through exile, migration, travel or correspondence, bodies, ideas and objects are permanently displaced, searching constantly for lines of flight that are impossible to pin down by any political regime. When associated with art, the elusive and ever-changing nature of movement can transform objects in events, creating anaffective network of images, words, objects, ideas and relations. The ideological potential of movement can be found acutely in artist’s publications, orinart in the form of printed matter, such as artists’books or mail art, which have the potential tocircumvent physical limitations imposed by repressive apparatuses. In addition, movement triggers imagination to put together all the elements of the collaborative network thus constructed and set it inmotion. This article takes a closer look atthe material and historical circumstances of these art objects that become deeply imbedded with ideology. By looking at the triangulation movement-time-space, I aim to investigate some of the ways women artists used printed matter to revise, confront and debunk totalizing narratives, such as women’s role in society, capitalism, slavery, colonialism, etc., narratives thatsustained and were themselves sustainedbythe repressive and dictatorial regimes that operated in Portugal and in Brazil.

References

Allen, G. (2014). The Artist as Bookmaker. In J. H. W. Rogan (Ed.), The Thing. The Book (pp. 13-24). San Francisco: Chronicle Books.

Benjamin, W. (1969). Thesis on the Philosophy of History (H. Zohn, Trans.). In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 253–264). New York: Schocken Books.

Brett, G. (2007). Para Anna Bella Geiger dezembro 2004 (L. Vilas-Boas, Trans.). In A. M. Navas (Ed.), Anna Bella Geiger: Territórios, Passagens, Situações (pp. 43–54). Rio de Janeiro: Casa da Palavra.

Brett, G. (2015). Licença Poética. In Alzugaray, P. (Org.). (2015). Regina Vater Quatro Ecologias [Exhibition catalogue] (pp. 22–26). Rio de Janeiro: Fio Editora.

Broude, N., & Garrard, M. D. (Eds.). (1994). The Power of Feminist Art. The American Movement of the 1970s, History and Impact. New York: Harry N. Abrams Incorporated.

Buarque de Hollanda, S. (2010). Visão do paraíso. Os motivos edênicos no descobrimento e colonização do Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Carrión, U. (1985). The New Art of Making Books. In J. Lyons (Ed.), Artists' Books: A Critical Anthology and Sourcebook (pp. 31– 44). New York: Visual Studies Workshop.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille Plateux – Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1986). Kafka, Toward a Minor Literature (D. Polan, Trans.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1992). O que é a Filosofia? (M. Barahona, Trans.). Lisboa: Editorial Presença.

Dias, F. P. L. S. R. (2008). A Nova-Figuração nas Artes Plásticas em Portugal (1958–1975). (Tese de doutoramento, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa).

Didi-Huberman, G. (2011). Atlas, or the Anxious Gay Science (S. B. Lillis, Trans., 2018 ed.). Chicago and London: The Chicago University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226439501.001.0001

Didi-Huberman, G. (2015). The order of material: Plasticities, malaises, survivals. In P. Lange-Berndt (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 195–211). London and Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT Press and Whitechapel Gallery.

Dumas, C. (2016). Diferenças e vozes em Ana Hatherly e Salette Tavares: Para uma nova estética. Cadernos de Literatura Comparada, 35, 29–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21747/16451112/litcomp35a2

Enzewor, O. (2008). The Postcolonial Constellation: Contemporary Art in the State of Permanent Transition. In T. Smith, O. Enzewor, & N. Condee (Eds.), Antinomies of Art and Culture. Modernity, Postmodernity, Contemporaneity (pp. 207–234). Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389330-015

Evans, D. (Ed.) (2009). Appropriation. London and Cambridge, Massachusstes: The MIT Press and Whitechapel Gallery.

Fico, C. (1997). Reinventando o otimismo: ditadura, propaganda e imaginário social no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

Fino, P. M. (2016). Os estereótipos turísticos como forma de manipulação durante a ditadura militar brasileira. (Doctoral dissertation, University of São Paulo, São Paulo).

Gama, G. L. G. (2009). Turismo e Ditaduras: a Construção da Imagem através das Políticas de Turismo. Paper presented at the VI Seminário da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo 10 e 11 de set. de 2009 (pp. 1–10). São Paulo: Univ. Anhembi Morumbi – UAM. Retrieved from https://www.anptur.org.br/anais/anais/files/6/116.pdf

Hatherly, A. (1973a). 63 Tisanas [40–102]. Lisboa: Moraes Editores.

Hatherly, A. (1973b). Mapas da Imaginação e da Memória. Lisboa: Moraes Editores.

Hatherly, A. (1975a). A Reinvenção da Leitura. Lisboa: Editorial Futura.

Hatherly, A. (1975b). O Escritor. Lisboa: Moraes Editores.

Hatherly, A. (1997). Representations of time during the Baroque period (Kennistranslations, Trans.). In P. P. d. Vale (2017, Ed.), Ana Hatherly e o Barroco (separate offprint). Lisbon: FCG.

Hatherly, A. (2003). A Mão Inteligente. Lisboa: Quimera.

Krauss, R. (2000). A Voyage on the North Sea: Art in the Age of the Post-Medium. London: Thames & Hudson.

Lippard, L. (Ed.) (1997). Six Years: the Dematerialization of the Art Object from 1966 to 1972. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lütticken, S. (2013). History in Motion. Time in the age of the moving image. Berlim: Sternberg Press.

Moeglin-Delcroix, A. (2015). Ambulo ergo sum. Nature as Experience in Artists' Books. Köln: Walther König.

Murilo de Carvalho, J. (1998). O motivo edênico no imaginário social brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 13 (38). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69091998000300004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69091998000300004

Navas, A. M. (2008). Ars Crítica (os sobre as pragas revisitadas de Regina Siveira). In Regina Silveira. Mundus admirabilis e outras pragas (pp. 24–34). [Exhibition catalogue]. São Paulo: Rush Gráfica/Galeria Brito Cimino.

Oliveira, M. (2014). Entre palavra e imagem: sobre uma possível abordagem política ao livro de artista (pp. 63-72). Revista Marte, 5.

Schneider, N. (2017). Propaganda ditatorial e invasão do cotidiano: a ditadura militar em perspectiva comparada. Estudos Ibero-Americanos, 43 (2), 333–345. https://doi.org/ 10.15448/ 1980-864X.2017.2.24745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-864X.2017.2.24745

Trizoli, T. (2014). Arte y feminismo en la dictadura militar de Brasil. In P. Palacios & C. Polo (Eds.), II Seminario Internacional de Historia de Arte y Feminismo. Del Discurso a la Exhibición (pp. 161–174). Chile: Dirección de Bibliotecas, Archivos y Museos.

Vasconcelos, M. A. de et al (Ed.) (2005). Ana Hatherly: Dessins, Collages et Papiers Peints (A. Costa e Sousa, Trans.). Paris: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

Ventura, R. (1991). Estilo Tropical. História cultural e polêmicas literárias no Brasil, 1870–1914. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Published

2020-07-31

How to Cite

Oliveira, M. (2020). Printed matter, nomad matter: On the ideological possibilities of artist’s publications. Diacrítica, 34(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.4985

Most read articles by the same author(s)