How to 'sell' the Portuguese language? Promoting the Portuguese language within two North America communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.5108Keywords:
Portuguese migration, Montreal, Bridgeport CT, Heritage Language, NormAbstract
This contribution presents the analysis of the position of the Portuguese language within two Portuguese communities located in North America: in Montreal, Quebec, Canada and in Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States of America. Enrollments are decreasing within the communitarian schools of the two communities, and some actors within these institutions are mobilizing discourses about the power of Portuguese as a global language of the future, a language of business. Thanks to our ethnographic approach, we observed discourses promoted by these institutions not anymore as a Heritage Language (HL), but ‘selling’ Portuguese as a new language for the future. Moreover, we realized how the nationalist paradigm in which one language is equal to one nation or community, and this refers to one norm, is maintained to support this new position. Due to a qualitative methodology, mixing interactional observation and semi-structured interviews, we aimed to articulate discursive analysis and analysis of language practices, mainly focusing onthe perception and the identification of what is perceived as the ‘good’ Portuguese. Speakers continue to interrogate mixed or hybrid practices according to their repertoires and considering each context or situation. This may help questioning the complex ideology of ‘purity’ of a language.
References
Almeida, E. (2014). La citoyenneté au-delà des frontières nationales: La politique étrangère brésilienne et les Brésiliens au Québec. RITA [en ligne}, 7(1).
Anctil, P. (1984). Double majorité et multiplicité interculturelle à Montréal. Recherches sociographiques, 25(3), 441-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/056117ar
Araújo, G. A. (2008). A língua portuguesa no Japão: Um panorama. In G.A. de Araújo & P. Aires (Eds.), A língua portuguesa no Japão (pp. 9-24). São Paulo, Brasil: Paulistana Editora.
Blommaert, J. (2013a). Complexity, accent, and conviviality: Concluding comments. Applied Linguistics, 34(5), 613-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt028
Blommaert, J. (2013b). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes. Bristol, Inglaterra: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419
Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 1-22.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307
Bonfiglio, T. (2010). Mother tongues and nations: +e invention of the native speaker. Nova Ioque, Estados Unidos da América: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078266
Calvet L. J. (2002). Le marché aux langues: Les effets linguistiques de la mondialisation. Paris, França: Plon.
Creese, A. & Blackledge, A. (2011). Separate and flexible bilingualism in complementary schools: Multiple language practices in interrelationship. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.006
Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1196-1208.
da Silva, J. F. & Gunnenwiek, K. (1992). Portuguese and Brazilian efforts to spread Portuguese.International Journal of Sociology of Language, 95(1), 71-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1992.95.71
De Fina, A. & Perrino, S. (2013). Transnational identities. Applied Linguistic, 34(5), 509-515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt024
Dorian, N.C. (1994). Purism vs. compromise in language revitalization and language revival. Language in Society, 23(1), 479-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500018169
Duchêne, A. & Heller, M. (Eds.) (2012). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. Nova Ioque, Estados Unidos da América: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155868
Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809842
Errington, J. (2001). Ideology. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Key terms in language and culture (pp. 110-112). Malden, Estados Unidos da América: Blackwell.
Eusébio, J. (2001). Falando Português em Montreal. Montreal, Canadá: Quebec World.
Faraco, C. A. (2012). Lusofonia: Utopia ou quimera? Língua, história e política. In T. Lobo et al. (Eds.), ROSAE: Linguística histórica, história das línguas e outras histórias (pp. 31-50). Salvador, Brasil: Editora da Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Flores, N. & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
(2), 149-171.
Fought, C. (2006). Language and ethnicity. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791215
Goza, F. (1994). Brazilian immigration to North America. International Migration Review, 28(1), 136-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2547029
Grimaldi, L. (1993 [1986]). Only in Bridgeport: An illustrated history of the Park City. Bridgeport, Estados Unidos da América: Windsor Publications.
King, K. A., Fogle, L. & Logan-Terry, A. (2008). Family language policy. Linguistics and Language Compass, 2(5), 907-922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00076.x
Kroskrity, P. V. (2004). Language ideologies. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 496-517). Malden, Estados Unidos da América: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996522.ch22
Le Page, R. B. & Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. Lippi-Green, R. (1997/2011). English with an accent. Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Londres, Inglaterra: Routledge.
May, S. ed. (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. Nova Iorque, Estados Unidos da América: Routledge.
Matos, A. Soeiro (2016). O ensino de Português na Ásia Oriental: De quem para quem. Forum Sociológico, 28(1), [on line], <http://journals.openedition.org/sociologico/1436>.
Mc Andrew, M. (2002). La loi 101 en milieu scolaire: Revue d’aménagement linguistique, (L’aménagement linguistique au Québec: 25 ans d’application de la Charte de la langue française), 69-84.
Mendes, E. (2012). Vidas em português: Perspectivas culturais e identitárias em contexto de português língua de herança (PLH). Platô, 1(2), 20-31.
Moura, M. de A. & Soares, I. (2003). Pionniers : L’avant-garde de l’immigration portugaise (Canada 1953). Montreal, Canadá: Direcção Geral dos Assuntos Consulares e Comunidades Portuguesas.
Park, J. S. Y. & Wee, L. (2017). Nation-state, transnationalism, and language. In S. Canagarajah (Ed.), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754512-3
The routledge handbook on migration and language (pp. 47-62). Nova Iorque, Estados Unidos da América: Routledge.
Pavlenko, A. & Blackledge, A. (2003). Introduction: New theoretical approaches to the study of negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. In A. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp. 1-33). Clevedon, Inglaterra: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596483-003
Penczer, L. Owen. (2018). The family comes first: Portuguese/Americans in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Arlington, Estados Unidos da América: Oneonta Press.
Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Nova Iorque, Estados Unidos da América: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846223
Pujolar, J. (2007). Bilingualism and the nation-state in the post-national era. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 71-95). Londres, Inglaterra: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596047_4
Rampton, B. (2011). From “multi-ethnic adolescent heteroglossia” to “contemporary urban vernaculars”. Language & Communication, 31(4), 276-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.01.001
Reto, L. (2012). Potencial económico da língua portuguesa. Alfragide, Portugal: Texto.
Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the USA. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3) [special issue edited by S. May], 348-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00296.x
Robichaud, D. (2004). La création du quartier portugais de Montréal. Une histoire d’entrepreneurs. Géographie Economie Societé, 6(4), 415-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.6.415-438
Rosa, J. & Trivedi, S. (2017). Diaspora and language. In S. Canagarajah (Ed.), The routledge handbook on migration and language (pp. 330-346). Nova Iorque, Estados Unidos da América: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754512-19
Ruiz, R. (2010). Reorienting language-as-resource. In J. E. Petrovic (Ed.), International perspectives on bilingual education: Policy, practice controversy (pp. 155-172). Charlotte, Estados Unidos da América: Information Age Publishing.
Scetti, F. (2015). “O português não é só a língua do passado e dos avós, mas é também uma nova língua do futuro!”. In Atas do XII CONLAB, 1° congresso da Associação Internacional de Ciências Sociais e Humanas em Língua Portuguesa (pp. 6443-6451). Lisboa, Portugal: FCSH – Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Scetti, F. (2016a). Évolution de la langue portugaise dans sa dynamique de transmission au sein de la «communauté portugaise » de Montréal DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/eccs.720
(Tese de doutoramento, Université Paris Descartes).
Scetti, F. (2016b). _e Portuguese language in the particular context of the “Portuguese community” of Montreal. In R. Muhr (Ed.), Pluricentric languages and non-dominant varieties worldwide. Part II: The pluricentricity ofPortuguese and Spanish. New concepts and descriptions (pp. 275-286). Viena, Áustria: Peter Lang Verlag.
Scetti, F. (2017). Variation dialectale du portugais parlé au sein de la communauté de Montréal. Géolinguistique, 17(1), 151-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/geolinguistique.407
Showstack, R.E. (2015). Institutional representations of ‘Spanish’ and ‘Spanglish’: managing competing discourses in heritage language instruction. Language and Intercultural Communication , 15(3), 341-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2015.1015350
Statistics Canada (2016). Census of Canada 2011: Immigration and ethnocultural diversity. Ottawa: Industry Canada, <http://www.12.statcan.ca>.
Statistics Canada (2009). Census of Canada 2006: Citizenship, immigration, birthplace, generation status, ethnic origin, visible minorities, and aboriginal peoples (97-557-XIE). Ottawa, Canadá: Industry Canada.
Statistics ITU (2016). Geneva: International Telecommunication Union, <http://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2016.pdf>.
Teixeira, C. & Da Rosa, V.M. Pereira (2009 [2000]). The Portuguese in Canada: Diasporic challenges and adjustment. Toronto, Canadá: University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442688827
Vieira, N. H. (1980). Bilingual–bicultural education for Portuguese Americans: An overview. In D.P. Macedo (Ed.), Issues in Portuguese bilingual education (pp. 3-22). Boston, Estados Unidos da América: National Assessment and Dissemination Center.
Woolard, K. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology
as a field of inquiry. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard & P.V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies. Nova Iorque, Estados Unidos da América: Oxford University.
Zucchi, J. (2007). A history of ethnic enclaves in Canada
(vol. 9). Canadian Historical Association.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fabio Scetti
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.