Time and postphotography
A practice-led research on duration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/2i.3434Keywords:
Duration, Post Photography, Practice-led Research, Time, DuregraphAbstract
This article presents a practice-led research project that asks how experienced time can be perceived through manipulated photographic images. The investigation is carried out by a series of digital images whose content is renegotiated over time, while the subject of the photograph remains within the frame. The artwork evidences an unstable space between a photographic composition and a moving image employed to question the power conventions in visualization and to expand the way we can conceive of time as duration in digital photographic images. It contributes to the discourse about practice-led oriented methodologies in the field of practice as a form of research through a comment on the design practice.
Downloads
References
Baker, G. (2005). Photography's expanded field. October, 120–140.
Barthes, R. (1977). The photographic message. In (Ed.). Image Music Text. London: Fontana Press, 15–31.
_____ (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. Macmillan.
Bazin, A. and Gray, H. (1960). The ontology of the photographic image. Film Quarterly, 13 (4), 4–9.
Benjamin, W. (2006). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In J. Morra y M. Smith (Eds.). Visual Culture: Experiences in Visual Culture: Routledge, 4, 114–137.
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin Books.
_____ (2003). Drawn to that moment. In G. Dyer (Ed.), John Berger: selected essays (pp. 419–423). United States of America: Pantheon Books.
Bergson, H. (1957). Time and free will. Edinburgh: George Allen & Unwin LTD.
Brubaker, D. (1993). Andre Bazin on automatically made images. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51(1), 59–67.
Candy, L. (2006). Practice based research: A guide. CCS report, 1(2).
Fredericks, D. C. (1993). Coping with transience: Ecclesiastes on brevity in life. Sheffield, England: JSOT Press.
Hamilton, J., & Jaaniste, L. (2010). A connective model for the practice-led research exegesis: An analysis of content and structure. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 3(1), 31–44.
Hunt, R. and McDaniel, M. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(4), 421–445.
Husserl, E. (1964). The Phenomenology of internal time-consciousness. Indiana University Press.
Jarret, C. (2019). Why meeting another’s gaze is so powerful. Disponible en: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190108-why-meeting-anothers-gaze-is-so-powerful.
Kesner, L., Grygarová, D., Fajnerová, I., Lukavský, J., Nekovářová, T., Tintěra, J., & Horáček, J. (2018). Perception of direct vs. averted gaze in portrait paintings: An fMRI and eye-tracking study. Brain and cognition, 125, 88–99.
Mortensen Steagall, M. (2019). The process of immersive photography: Beyond the cognitive and the physical (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), p. 6–18.
Nassar, I. (2007). On photographs and returning the gaze. Journal of Palastine Studies 31, 3–5.
Ritchin, F. (2010). After Photography. W. W. Norton & Company.
Rorty, Richard (1982). Consequences of pragmatism (essays 1972–1980). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rowse, D. (2020). Where is Your Subject Looking and Why Does it Matter?, n.d. Disponible en: https://digital-photography-school.com/where-is-your-subject-looking-and-why-does-it-matter/
Sartre, J.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness. Philosophical Library.
Sontag, S. (1977). On Photography. United States of America: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Steagall, M. M. & Ings, W. (2018). Pesquisa de doutorado practice-led e a natureza dos métodos imersivos. DAT Journal, 3(2), 392–423.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 David van Vliet, Marcos Mortensen Steagall
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
